I often label it as too much forward-thinking. Another mindf**k of the market:rolleyes:
Can you give a concrete example?
Easy, just enter around the dotted line. Example on ES. You could frame it as an ORB strategy. Imagine having done this with the trump coin...
Aren’t this interesting times to live in don’t you think? I’m glad I wasn’t born in eg the Middle Ages, or American Primeval-like times
Funny, indeed. But price is observable at t, while (expected) future volatility can only be observed in a period t, t+1 So what you could do in...
1) It’s not P(expiring itm) and 2) speed is not derived from acceleration (of a lambo)
wxy, no offense, but this is really the very very basics part. It’s even in the name, ‘implied’ It’s not implied price
Dude..
Is that true?
How can one know?
Lower level I understand, but I cant imagine that in the distant future significant trials are faught by ai agents (who are done in a quantum-second)
A good lawyer?
What exactly do you mean by that? I must say that I do notice some subtle differences in the behavior of the new vz. Or at least, I think I do
Getting weirder here. I had some dm with Vz135, and asked for a detail from a historic thread, which he answered correctly. fwiw I also sent you...
I have some spare time so could do the “audit”. To make it comparible to a benchmark like SPX I could create simply an equal weighted pf and...
I always throught indices were refractive and thus suggesting nucleosynthesis. Bummer
Lol tell that to fartcoin
I think there is analogy with Edison here. Inventing the lightbulb was “easy”, developing the infrastructure and mass adoption was the really hard...
Like an unknown (but good) PA once said: “can you f*ck a car? No. So don’t chase cars”
:strong::thumbsup::)
Separate names with a comma.