I would opine that every president is concerned about impeachment. But first, you would need to have impeachable offenses-----which you don't.
Who were the people close to him?
Yet more people approve of him than disapprove
Everything I see still indicates that this upmove is in it's infancy.
I am in favor of a little back and fill and then a barefoot run to the Jack. Would rather not see a cinder chew back to the buggy.
It wuddent hard.As soon as I saw the upper BB (an indicator) tagged, I knew it would back off a bit.
Hillary Clinton has just announced that she will run for president again in 2020. This should have Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders ticked off right...
Now, there is someone who hasn't been investigated that paid for and colluded for information to effect the outcome of an election and that is...
Leftists are all excited that the Cohen payments are campaign finance violations and of course nothing could be further from the truth. First and...
I've already explained this in full. Debate? now concluded.
1 for 2 today. Long is still in vogue for tomorrow.
It's practice on something I have been working on as another avenue.
You mean like this call?
Nearly made it again to the end of the day---
Instead we are running back to the shanty.
They are trying to take it out and there is a good setup for it to be done. I stand by my call though.
As with a lot of discussions of The Constitution, in the US, we really on interpretation and precedent. Just ask any Lefty about Roe v Wade and...
This is based on precedent and is what The Left always cites. In fact it's the first question that Dianne Finklestein asks SCOTUS nominees.
It would be nice to run back up to the hawk before closing, but may have to wait until tomorrow for that. We certainly are still in long mode and...
Certainly. Your contention about Rodney King has nothing to do whether a president can be impeached for something that occurred prior to being...
Separate names with a comma.