It's not, one variable is not enough.
<img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/10/24/opinion/102412krugman1/102412krugman1-blog480.jpg"> <img...
lol, nice
Good post, by the way.
Austerity is Austerity and It's Failed in the UK By Matthew Yglesias Posted Thursday, Oct. 25, 2012, at 10:03 AM ET "The failure of...
Apply your own logic. If his birth certificate is a fake, his transcripts will be, too.
Neither can a hundred years go by on Earth when you travel near the speed of light in space for only a year. That's crazy talk.
There is a 100% probability that the wealthy of either party will not take to the street, regardless of who wins the election. This is beyond...
I do suspect this imbalance will not be seen in the "on time" voters, though.
This is a bunch of "Obamaloney"!
Nothing ridiculous about it, it's in every freshmen year logic and critical thinking textbook. And you don't understand why.
The "empty suit", aka Bullet-Point Man, is not elected yet.
Lmao, lil lukie trying to downplay actual voting results.
Excellent argument for cap and trade, or if you prefer, a carbon tax.
Shh! Romney is winning.
That you don't see why the syllogism I posted is a fallacy tells me that anyone can become a lawyer. :D :D
So in your mind it's not a fallacy. I knew that, or you wouldn't keep using it to make your, for example, global warming and tax/revenue arguments.
Why does this fallacy: If A then B. B. Therefore, A. confuse you?
No, it will be in the context that you don't like context if it refutes your assertions.
Hyperinflation! Soaring interest rates!! Buy gold!!!
Separate names with a comma.