Potentially, sure.
Any interviewer that DOESN'T understand that is an indication the firm is too stupid to work for.
This sounds right.
This goes to what I was saying earlier - clearly the last bet of a sequence like this should be against your "life roll", not your immediate cash...
It seems like we'd be better off if more shorting activity in "difficult" circumstances where borrow isn't plentiful moved to SSF. Then this crap...
What time frame of data and what instruments?
That looks like what I expected - our old solution, plus a bunch of what appear to be equivalent ones all with the same score. And I think that...
Disagree. R-14 and R-16 are potential red bets too. Not singles, but they have to be covered to synthesize Red.
I'll take a run at it tonight. I can't see anything wrong with the equivalent math though so I'll be amazed if the solver shows a preference.
I'm pretty sure how red is handled is a tossup. I believe placing 1 unit on Red is exactly equivalent to placing 1/18th unit on the 18 various...
I THINK we will see both of those at zero. Betting on each black # is strictly cheaper than bettering 1 unit on black and gives the same...
Another weird observation: the Kelly de-rating process (where you divide all bets by a factor in the 1-10 range to smooth out the equity curve) is...
Not sure that's right. My math says a Log10 increase per spin of 0.142... so 1.42... for 10 spins which is 10^1.42... = 26.63 multiplier.
Incidentally, I confirm nonlinear5's results via Excel's solver. And I definitely just fell out of love with the Excel solver. It couldn't...
I suggested earlier that the winner could easily be a blend of the pure arbitrage and the higher expectation non-arbitrage. That's what we got....
You didn't say anything about not borrowing either. If I'm in a casino with a pure arbitrage in front of me, and I can't borrow against it, then...
I wish. I probably won't play a hand until the July 4th week. I'm hoping to go out to Vegas and play 80/160 LHE or whatever big stud I can find...
Yeah, the more I think about it I think you can bunch the "total amount bet on black/green" into one term since they're obviously symmetrical. It...
Probably not - it's possible here because the various strategies are a) complete (you can bet on every possible outcome) b) net positive...
If you were allowed to borrow money to make the bets (ie. sum of the bets > 1000 was OK as long as max loss was < 1000) then I think there's no...
Separate names with a comma.