:D
I'm not sure I want to know.... *** so, we're all huggy huggy now (judging by the last few posts)?
sounds like women at the hairdressers...
no, it simply cannot be. sleazy lawyers? in New York?
well said.
. That from this....http://www.dailyfx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1807&Itemid=39.
you obviously have read this: http://speculationsblog.blogspot.com/2004_12_01_speculationsblog_archive.html#110238715987083407.
you know how it is. when you make money, you're a bsd. when you lose money, it's Greenspan's fault.
yeah, but it's a pretty ballsy move, in an oriental way :D . still, the rule is, "possession is 9/10 of the law."
oh, i just love how the big days bring out the heros!!
kewl, master. be sure to post a few of the ones that go the other way. that is, if that ever happens to you.
No. It's really more like this.
I was sure you were talking about Buffet's little dollar bet w/Berkshire Hath's equity, but no.
invalidated? pshaw. interest rate futures are fungible. stock indices are hedged off or by the stock market which, last time I checked, was...
yeah, but the market demands more than just low rates and electronic matches. it demands information and tested relationships. that's how...
dude, you need to get out more.
duh, me. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=%5EVIX&t=my It's about where it was just before the biggest bull market in modern history,...
has anyone got a 10 + year chart of the VIX? Yo, chasinfla!
used to read articles about all the business he owned, though. and the 30 yr is getting more liquid. Not the ingredients for a blowout.
not quite ready to concede that, yet. It may have sucked in a few players, but it's not a "significant reserve currency." fraying socialist...
Separate names with a comma.