"Big down day". :) Not all the clowns are in the circus . . . LC
I love the way he tosses around the word "analysis". :) LC
Probably not. Some people, when faced with their own ignorance, will say, simply, "I don't know", then proceed to find out. Most, however, become...
If nothing else, the reluctance to answer simple questions should set off bells. LC
A beginner learns fairly quickly that entries are no great trick. LC
That's not what he said. Try again, kid. You may get it eventually. LC
I'm astonished that you would suggest that this sort of thing goes on at ET. LC
That's not the point. I understand it. You don't. Therefore you dismiss it. Which is why you remain so ignorant. Try thinking. It may hurt for...
Re disconnects from reality, you of all people should know. And the fact that you don't understand the rest of it speaks volumes. LC
Good question. Is this really somebody -- or anyone like them -- one would want to spend the day with in a chat room? Especially if they still...
Are you always this much of a jackass? Or did it just come over you all of a sudden?
You mean never? :eek: LC
Like all great tap dancers, couldn't resist a curtain call. Hook, anyone? :) LC
Most likely he'll claim that he closed it at the turning point . . . :) LC
Marketsurfer's eyes must be brown :) LC
Yes, of course :) LC
And yet you continue to claim to be able to do so. Another inconsistency . . . :) LC
Disagree all you like, but TA existed long before indicators. See ya. LC
Why am I not surprised? Classical TA predates these by decades. Some would argue centuries. LC
Yes, you can define it however you like. You can define it as book value. And, no, you do not have to agree that TA correctly defined was the...
Separate names with a comma.