100% focus is easier said than done Hog. Agree?.
You will have to prove to yourself and others that your suggestions bring in at least 1 tic per day on average extra profit over the original...
Sometimes I can guess better than 50-50, other times it is just a coin toss.
Not by name. No.
Exactly. That makes you an exceptional candidate for using the method explained in the first post of this thread. Maybe you will lose less?. If...
I would argue that it is very easy for them, since they are one of the two primary dealers left, the other JP Morgan is probably privy to the same...
I would say that they do give a shit, but that's just my opinion. Maybe you do have a better understanding of the inner workings of the decision...
I seriously doubt you can prove that to yourself and others, but be my guest, maybe you arrive at the opposite conclusion if you work on it?. I...
I do that all the time.
Check out Mike and mag posts for some interesting and CONCRETE ideas to improve over the original LOSING method and rules. Maybe you can come...
You can only profit by: 1-Giving liquidity to losers. OR 2-Taking liquidity from winners. OR 3-Both of the above. In all cases...
Think EXITS wee man. That's what produces the returns vs. risk taken.
Thanks for the translations ehorn. Can we now further translate into objective rules in english that a computer or an 8 year old would...
Aside of the fun component, there is a VOLUMEtric reason that I'm hoping to eventually develop. Think where the money losing orders aggregate...
Excellent contribution mag. I'll try to come back with some suggestions about it later on.
I feel fine. I will learn something new, or he'll hang himself with his own rope, or both. How are YOU feeling?.
So... you can actually write in English if you choose to?. Nice. I'm being as open minded as I can.
Thorp made a lot of money with this roulette approach, and a similar one applied to blackjack, before going to Wall Street to make even more...
Mike: Let's try to push this improvement of yours a little further. Please consider: 1-Using a symmetrical method that would take the exactly...
Separate names with a comma.