IMO, the only way to make some sense of today is to treat 1205 as 'real' P2 on 5 min ES level fractal.
Another logical way of looking at it is this - if we don't have a completed sequence for a channel, then we don't have a channel, period. And what...
sorry, 12/02
I have obtained the proof that is sufficient for me by studying the charts. The measure of sufficiency may be different for you, which is OK by me.
In other words, this whole thing appears to me to be a case of channel RTL breach prior to sequence completion simply requires a slight 'fan' of...
I once asked Spydertrader if his red point three down here: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1986501 was suppose to have...
1540 yesterday made a VE which is usually followed by accel traverse - one can consider the situation yesterday eob as sequence not being...
IMO, the faster fractal (2nd orange) sequence completion completed the slower fractal (pink) as well. P.S. I don't share other poster's view of...
LOL, I guess there's a limit on how many traverses can be accelerated in one day. Btw, If anybody came across the day where both traverses in...
so far
You're nothing but one month old alias of the same tired ... that you were before you changed your screen name. FYI, sufficient data exists to...
I looked at both of your pics - your gaussians and trendlines don't seem to follow any convention that would make sense to me. I am not saying...
Your point is valid and normally would be sufficient to determine that @1350 we haven't finished moving p2 to p3. However, there may be another...
While I am unable to find the clues in tapes and gaussians alone (leaving out the p2 to p3 lateral, which is another vocabulary word:D) as to why...
You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. People are getting 'it' and for those who are getting 'it' your creative writing is...
As much as I'd like to, I can't explain the hiccup @ 1350 without a lateral beginning @ 1320.
LOL, I met them both in person, and they are not complaining.:D
On the same fractal. However, 'illegitimate' P2's exist as well, but on a faster fractal.
To me they seem to be pointing to where the change will result in a new sequence in an opposite direction on the same fractal, e.g. change at 1125...
Separate names with a comma.