you werent around in 2000
graduated from 100-proof university. the 10yr program. long before many posters here were born.
solely dependent on how thick beer goggle lenses were the night before. there is always a morning after to contend with
dozen ways of death and destruction is the price man pays for use => abuse of alcohol. no beneficial use for alcohol consumption exists. 100%...
likewise gun control. which amendment do you propose to trash?
but i dont understand. we seemed to be getting on so well. and you had so much to offer
then fixation on the cause is paramount
perhaps a short connection?
who tossed the term "impotent" tied to guns in first post?
jeffrey dahmer never owned a gun. arthur shawcross, neither. each killed more than one dozen victims
agreed
never mistake fascination with observation. microscopic as the difference may be
rcanfiel => phd from bunghole university. cum laude
pity to degrade such an otherwise esteemed establishment here
so therefore the points are moot?
over you? two inches of egotistical narcissism there
when all criminals are off the street, no further need for legal carry permits. criminals dont have concealed carry permits. or any permits. that...
for the intended tools that they are: hunting and recreational shooting. at least guns have some type of non-harmful use. total elimination of all...
I prefer to be defended from a position of strength. That aint you in this thread US does not need to take guns from hands of criminals. US...
try this one, canadaboy: Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire have relaxed gun laws, lowest levels of crime in US. Mass, particularly Boston...
Separate names with a comma.