History is better in text form. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
So your problem is that Obama wasn't touting a claim that wasn't scored by the CBO at all. Why the hell would he talk about projections that were...
I am not saying anything, CBO is saying that. The omnibus bill that was signed in March 2009 led to 31 billion increase in immediate spending i.e....
This is false, only 31 billion of outlays were part of FY 2009, rest went into FY 2010 which didn't show any big increase in spending from a 2008...
Actually that's how the CBO works, they do 10 year estimates and if you look at the CBO numbers - they were for 11 years and the yearly increase...
Not true, some provisions kick in which only costs fraction of the money. Exactly. In 2014, most provisions start kicking in which is where...
Your chart backs up exactly what Obama said! Let's do some basic math based on your table. From 2010 to 2020, the cost is indeed 900...
Says the guy who never ONCE addressed the issue of deficit caused by Obamacare, you keep talking costs which you are completely wrong about too....
The actual cost is lower because a lot less people signed up for it, the initial cost was projected to be much higher when the program passed....
Because Republicans passed the bill based on the initial assumption, they didn't care that nearly a trillion dollar would be added to the debt...
That's why I said the original cost (at the time of passing which legislators relied on then and still passed it) were much higher including debt...
First, you never ONCE backed up the claim that Obamacare adds to the deficit, you quoted an article that talked about COSTS and had nothing to do...
So you are going back to stimulus again which is exactly my point. You have to compare every Bush spending item with the stimulus to show that...
First two I agree. But you cannot honestly compare Medicare Part D with Obamacare, Medicare Part D was COMPLETELY unpaid for, it's original...
This is obviously false if you look at the outlays recorded by the CBO, the outlays were 150 billion in 2009 and were already part of the federal...
That's why I said COMPARED to Bush and Reagan he is a fiscal conservative, by himself Obama is not a fiscal Conservative. Also, as I have asked...
Not 200, it's 150 billion. And the reason '150 billion' didn't make a dent in the spending levels (as I have said again and again) is because...
How are tax cuts attributed as spending in the first place? It was certainly not me who was making that point, you simply assumed it out of...
First, I wasn't talking about the 'gap' in outlays, the gap of 150 billion dollars between two fiscal years wasn't significant enough to lower the...
Were you not paying attention in 2010? He didn't really make a choice there, 42 Senate Republicans threatened to filibuster ALL legislation (yes...
Separate names with a comma.