As usual, you are mischaracterizing my position in order maintain the argument so that you can attempt to demonstrate your superior argumentation...
...just insult me in passing and then appeal to authority. Rather than engage you at all, I will just provide a link to the most recent Leonard...
Doesn't matter what things seem like -- it matters how they are actually measured -- and they don't measure any intelligent designer, other than...
Since you have now indirectly attacked me, I'm forced to respond. You are arguing exactly the reverse of what is required to prove your...
The big bang is not magic because there is objective observable scientific evidence supporting the emanation of all matter in the universe from...
This is a frivolous response. If it's what you really believe, then your reasoning ability is far below your writing skills. Since I don't find...
Your example is based on the dual false premise that (1) all natural causes have been exhausted and falisifed, and (2) some evidence of sabotage...
I didn't say that my proposed proofs would "convince me of design." I said that they would convince me that there is a "case" for design,...
You always advance your conclusions as if they are undeniable. Saying "False," just makes you seem disingenuous. What matters for the purposes...
I have told you on multiple occasions what would convince me that there is a case for design: evidence, i.e.: 1. A visit or communication from...
You are far too smart to not recognize that you are confusing a public policy argument about how scientists should resolve inconclusive findings...
Your comments are relevant to a public policy discussion, but not to a scientific one. I'm not advocating any particular public policy....
Thank you for this explanation of your position. Dembski's rationale seems to me to be an attempt to obfuscate the ultimate point. Which is, that...
OK, what is your "intuitive, cumulative, circumstantial case for a teleological origin of life?"
Teleologist, you say you have no "proof," yet you simultaneously state that you can make a circumstantial case. I've already defined proof and...
I'm completely open to your proof, if it is based on some verifiable test (including a statistical test inferring a certain conclusion)....
Agreed. I think that the reason why the scientist tend to favor the "natural" answer is simply because the alternative is a supernatural...
Inference: to draw a conclusion from a predicate fact. Proof: Evidence which tends to make a material fact more or less probable. I have...
Re subjectivity: I didn't say that subjectivity was wrong. I said that subjectivity is inescapable, but that eventually enough subjective facts...
I'm not dismissing ID out of hand. I'm simply suggesting that the ID advocate produce some evidence to support ID, other than just saying that...
Separate names with a comma.