You state that a case can be made for ID. The Discovery Institute's most revered figures attempted to do exactly that in Dover and they lost --...
That sounds pretty nice, however you failed to cite the author of your rebuttal, apparently one "Davit Pratt," who appears from my rather quick...
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz: So stop the defamation. I deny defaming you, and it's up to you to prove otherwise in a court of law. I will be...
My statements are not slanderous, because, among other things, slander is the legal term for "verbal" defamation. The correct legal term for...
Your links are especially interesting to me. Thanks for posting them. You also state that you think that ID should be taught along side...
You understand my response jess fine, hooney. You're playing games, and intentionally avoiding a direct response. If you want to play Socrates...
Look, either explain your position or decline. If you decline, the conversation is over.
So, your version of creation is essentially the Biblical Genesis, correct?
PS. If you want to show that it is reasonable to induce that biological organisms are the consequence of design, and you want to do this without...
I see. Of course, that logic would have to apply for the overwhelming majority of scientists who find evolution to be the correct explanation of...
Already did that in this thread. Multiple identical retroviral insertions in the germ line of all related primate species. In order for this to...
As I just pointed out, I have provided evidence throughout this conversation, so I am not speaking as a self designated personal authority on...
We're not talking about what "many" will argue. We're talking about science and scientific proof. And, as previously stated, an argument is...
If you state that "my personal authority" carries "no logical weight" in the argument, while simultaneously knowing that I have been providing...
If you're gonna resort to an ad hominem attack, I'm not gonna continue the discussion, so try to stick with facts to support your argument.
Beg all you want. It doesn't change the fact that rejecting the literal interpretation of Adam and Eve does not automatically reject the existence...
Your legal analogy is meaningless in this discussion. The "ultimate" truth is not provable under ANY burden of proof. The only thing that can be...
You ask them. It's your "scientific" hypothesis that they won't know that the drawing is ridiculous. Now you go out and make your case....
Evolution does not advance a theory of no God, so by your definition, it is not atheism in practice. Evolution merely advances the theory that God...
Nice try, however your description of courtroom burdens of proof is incorrect as a matter of law. No one wins in court by merely impeaching...
Separate names with a comma.