1074 -1050 = 24 1100 - 1074 = 26 therefore 1074 is closer to 1050 than it is to 1100. Understanding this quantitative data, can anyone...
OK Einstein, which of the above choices in the poll is most correct to YOU?
Justifiably this thread continues, because the question is "how high can the S&P go in 2003"?? I'm here tonight to talk trading. Enough...
when I ask walter to continue this highly educational thread. Right now, this is the main source of laughter in my otherwise quiet world. Please...
I don't belittle you AFAYK
I'm still trying to figure out where all of this came from. I certainly am not known for changing rules as I go, i'm known around here for making...
Thanks for the consolation, Mr. Subliminal, it is appreciated. But you see, there was a time in my life when I would have been in category (3)....
my apologies, Mr. Subliminal, not only are you intelligent, but savvy as well. But why leave me hanging there and looking foolish? AFAIC that's...
This is what I said yesterday. I still believe this poll is for each of us who voted to decide if we were right, and it probably has more to do...
Check the times. I was on to you before this latest. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?postid=384901#post384901
Nolan-Vinny-Sam, so which one are you, wiggle or ptpigeon? Looks to be wiggle. But look at the company you're in. Yikes!
The funny part is that he has no clue about it.
Do you know what you did here? Mr. Subliminal racks his brain all day to come up with 4 excellent answers. I was convinced this was a complete...
I'm at a loss. And what you your point be? Do you not agree that 1074 is closer to 1050 than it is to 1100?
From a quantitative standpoint, a high of 1074 is closer to 1050 than 1100. If you play on words, like you have, then you can fudge any of them...
Separate names with a comma.