I screwed something up since 13:20 was a Pt2.
Are you sure that this post provides a complete and thorough understanding of how to identify, analyze and act on Spike bars in all circumstances?
The following is a list (hopefully complete) of issues that cause me chronic problems, frustrations and of course the ever present losses. Perhaps...
I am very interested to learn why the 9:30 bar did not represent a SOC of the completed traverse from yesterday and start the move from Pt1 to Pt2...
Spyder, Was the 10:35 bar the end of a traverse and channel (which began yesterday at 15:05) and the beginning of an entirely new traverse? If...
My suggestion would be to recreate a chart Spyder posts bar bar bar and try to answer the question "he annotated this bar like this because..." If...
Truth be told I got snookered by the down move that started at 15:15. In hindsight, as tough as it would have been, I believe a "hold" was the...
:)
We are on the third traverse of a down channel (Dwn - Lat - Dwn). It looks like a possible Pt2 has been formed and we are in the process of moving...
Ticktrade et. al. attached is my revised view of 10-24. The 15:00 bar could be a Pt1 since it is a BO of a Lateral Traverse. As such it needs to...
Even better...MADA all day :D
Weeks not over, but so far yesterday visited serious damage on my weeks P&L, but more importantly, IMHO a trader is only as good as their weakest...
I will add "Lack of 'continuation" to my list of "Traverse Level Signals of Change", but it will apply to a whole bunch of scenarios. A...
It is my understanding that in order for an IBGS to kill a lateral it has to form in increasing volume.
This exercise proves trickier than one might think. For instance, it appeared to me a no brainer to have a lateral starting at 10:05 to 10:35, but...
Issues of Confusion 10-22-08 1. Looking for the Signal of Change at or around 10:05. Concerning 13:20, 13:25 and 13:30 all would have...
I find myself in agreement with ticktrade regarding the lack "dominant" on the first down traverse starting at 10:30. The following is my play by...
Can we stipulate from this point forward, that all referenced bars are henceforth and forever more considered "[close of]" and eliminate the...
you too :p
:p
Separate names with a comma.