So you're advocating we go ahead with Obama's jobs bill. Good.
I left out one important part, the part Siegel apparently cares about most, taxation.
Good call. Should Romney win we can reasonably expect a Reaganesque expansion of government spending on the military and its supply chain, and an...
As Yannis admitted yesterday, reps are hoping (there's that word again) that the voters find these facts too esoteric, that is, reps are hoping...
So right now businesses are turning down sales because they lack "confidence"?
Ryan what he deserved. He got his respect years ago when he first trotted his ideas and plans out. In those years all three sides have analyzed...
By the numbers, Romney lied, or "misattributed", as his staff put it, 100% of the time during his first debate.
At any rate, the rep blather about an explosion of government under Obama is bullshit.
Actually, this is CCH reaping what Germany has sown.
So I win on the theocracy in America question. Better luck next time.
You're not sure?
Current events, how parochial of you.
So now you support government spending. I'm sure you recognize the job creation benefits of that as well, right?
It's not necessary to use the word to convey the meaning. For example, Romney's debate was full of hope and change appeals. Particularly the...
Excellent question! What years were the Salem Witch Trials?
Overheard in Greece, "you will pay me the money you owe me, even if it means you have to quit working to do so!" Lol
So what you're saying is, and this is supported by your chart, the employment situation was improving from 2003 to 2007? Edit: because of Bush?
I like your logic. Wasserman gets a pass.
Put your glasses on, Goofy, according to the chart you posted (did I mention that it's a good chart?), the employment situation was deteriorating...
Yes, that's the point of my reply. It does go back to reps, particularly the tea party nutcases, who do not understand the difference between...
Separate names with a comma.