I tested some systems with equities going back to the mid 90's. Guess what? They didn't do shit when I forward tested them. Did you forward...
I don't know. You may be correct. This is where 'backtesting' becomes sketchy, IMO. I always use 1.5x tick size for slippage when using...
The only problem with using BS's is factoring in potential slippage in a backtest. As you probably know a half tick in slippage incorrectly...
Seems you are right Chi Sq Pdf x= 0 is .5 Can you actually explain what this means? Neither my teacher or book are helping.. I am probably...
First question : Why is the peak of the distribution always just a bit before the actual dF? This can be seen here.. [img] Second : Why when...
Why is it not normally distributed ( may be dumb question )?
Nice call.
Is this not a 2 sample z-test?
How about drug testing elected representatives for a change?
Could you give some examples if you find the time?
Sp500 @ 408 with 0% interest rates? I really doubt it brother.
The discipline after years of leaking money like you are now. Not saying that I do. Maybe you should change your tactics a bit by using options...
Nice play.
probably. or was this obviously redundant?
I guess if the police feel so compelled. Everyone has tried weed? Doubtful. I am sure you are a great guy and all but seriously.....
drugabuse.gov? lol - that's all I gotta say.
Dude, because if you haven't heard yet weed doesn't make you deaf, dumb and blind. That is establishment type talk there. Yeah, I may be in...
It is exactly how it was presented. The definition of sample size bias makes sense. But it wasn't presented like that - it was presented as if...
But that isn't the point. OK, great that is the definition. But it wasn't presented like that. Nor does it matter ( my only point this whole...
OK, but she said it was in reference to people HAVING MORE THAN OTHER PEOPLE. I can see that definition, but I haven't looked it up personally....
Separate names with a comma.