So in other words, your "opportunity cost" presentation was all just BS. JB
And to complete it, there are many, many hills in this world where people are saying 'there is gold below". Why aren't you at each and every one...
V00: >If you are standing on a mountain and someone >says there is gold below it, an atheist would argue >that there is not because they do...
V00: >If I was to catch someone pretending to >be God, then I would question my belief >in the existence of one. LOL -- well, that's not...
TraderZones = Rcanfiel JB
V00: >Amen. Me: That's really interesting. Anything to support it other than your wandering mind? JB
rcn: >LOL... O.K. Maybe I should have said that "it is >obvious in my opinion." Ok, quite fair enough. I have no problem with opinion....
LOL -- the only thing "obvious" is that you can't follow the logic of what you wrote. Your above statement is correct .. "no God, no judge.",...
I don't suppose it would do any good to ask you to provide support your assertion. Naahhh -- never mind. JB
Voo: >The only choice from a logic argument is agnosticism. A: I AM an agnostic, but your logic is beyond suspect (see "B") B: Since...
>BTW, your oxygen analogy works against you. >Oxygen's existence can be tested. And it looks like >8 protons, 8 neutrons, and 8 electrons....
MT: >You quote me a NY newspaper......, Yes I did, -- an article which quotes the show to which you referred. >Turok; thats not the exact...
OMG Murray, you are such a gullible dork. http://www.nypost.com/seven/11092007/tv/did_history_channel_find_big_foot__713410.htm Even the...
MurrayT: >Turok ; >Actually an excellent comparison, because >there has been scientific DNA evidence of big foot, ROFLAO!! OMG! Stop it...
V00: >Faith is no different from trust. Both require >belief without evidence. If you trust *or* have faith without evidence, you'll be in...
V00: >So do you expect me to believe anothers >experience about seeing oxygen ? No, get your own bucket. Next. JB
1000: >WHAT IS IT THAT YOU DON'T GET!!!!!!!!!! >!!!!! JESUS (I'll keep repeating it until you deal with it) I don't get why you assert the...
Rat: >i've read theories on how it could have been done.. Me: >How do the theories you've read address the key >items in this post?...
1000: >WHAT IS IT THAT YOU DON'T GET. Ok, as simply as I can put it -- here's what I don't get. I don't get why you assert the following:...
1000: >1. How in the world do you call the implosions >of the Towers an explosives demo job? That's >my question. Before you look any more...
Separate names with a comma.