this really should end the fake news issue. plus the person who caught this on tape... said the bbc wanted to film it too.
So what is fake about that, are they not real Muslims or something? Were they paid? Those people were protesting on the side. CNN wanted to make sure they were in the shot and show what was happening was in view of the camera. More grasping at straws
What was staged? Were they not Muslims? Were they not protesting before CNN got there? How is getting them in the shot fake? Staged would mean that CNN paid them to do something that they weren't doing, clearly that's not the case.
1. I have no idea if they were Muslim do you? The probably are but, how do we know since this shot this was clearly set up. 2. I have no idea if they were protesting on their own or if they organized by some group or they were paid. What are your sources? there were a lot of cameras. Do they have shots of the organic protest? I would like to see the shots. 3. Staged means set up for the cameras. There is no doubt that shot is staged. Your defense would be that the shot was just a recreation of a legit spontaneous not prompted or paid for demonstration. The onus is on you to prove your arguments. The comment about the flowers on the ground leaves me to conclude the reporter had little integrity. Those flowers were very deliberately placed there for the camera. It was kind of sick.
1. They look Muslim based on their ethnicity and what they are wearing 2. If you have no idea then why are you calling it staged? Why would I have a source to prove a negative? You are making the claim that they were staged, just getting them in the shot doesn't make the protests staged - you have to prove that they were paid or planted 3. Yes, the SHOT is staged, not the protest. News crews often do that when they cannot easily move the cameras or if police prevents movement which they were in this case (can you not see the tape?). And why would I have to prove your claim that the protest was staged? And what is this flower BS? Did CNN buy them? What is your proof? That CNN dared to shoot flowers? Overall, what exactly are you whining about? You guys keep talking about how Muslims won't speak out and when they do, you ignore that and turn it into a conspiracy. Everything is a conspiracy.
I willing to bet the "protestors" are paid and come from a talent agency. Prove me wrong. Any "protest" organized by Muslims right now in the U.K. would occur at a very public place with easy media access. The news media would not have to organize a staged circus like the one seen in this video.
LOL, that's not how these things work, you are making the claim so YOU prove it. And this wasn't US by the way, this was London. You don't even know that and yet you are sure that it was staged?
You said... What was staged? Were they not Muslims? Were they not protesting before CNN got there? How is getting them in the shot fake? Staged would mean that CNN paid them to do something that they weren't doing, clearly that's not the case. response. 1. You agree the shot was staged. 2. You implied they were Muslim... now you are saying they look muslim. Oddly racist? What if I said the pretty one look yazidi... does that mean anything. is that racist? 3. Getting them in the shot? that is rich. The shot should have been their organic protest. At the very least there should have some video of the organic protest. There were a lot of cameras there. Before you can say they were just getting them in the shot wouldn't you like to see the original protest? by the way... it looks like this group was trotting around London. Just letting them through the cordon?