https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/15/illegal-immigration-documentary-americas-forgotten/ A director set out to make a documentary favoring illegal immigration and migrant caravans. But after investigating, Namrata Singh Gujral realized that illegal immigration actually harmed everyone involved, the director told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Gujral, a registered Democrat, said the stories of a homeless veteran, an illegal immigrant, a dead six-year-old girl, and the mother of a law enforcement officer killed by an illegal alien — all featured in her film, “America’s Forgotten” — are representative of those impacted by illegal immigration, Gujral told the DCNF. In her investigation into their stories, she “discovered the truth behind immigration fraud,” she said. “I set out to make a film that was going to be very pro-illegal immigration, pro-caravans, pro-migrants, that’s where I started. The film ended up completely different, and I think it was because I stuck with the investigation,” Gujral told the DCNF. “I was at a crossroads. Do I tell the truth and go ahead and make the film or do I walk away from the film because it doesn’t agree with me or my industry?” Gujral told the DCNF. “I decided to stay truthful to my craft of filmmaking and tell the story as I saw it without bias or preconceived notions.” Gujral said the turning point for her was when she went to India to search for the grandfather of a girl named Gurupreet Kaur, who died in the Arizona desert while trying to illegally immigrate to the U.S. Gujral went to the same home and sat in the same marble-floored room where a CNN reporter previously conducted an interview with Gurupreet’s grandfather. She saw no signs of violence or poverty or persecution in the neighborhood. Gurupreet’s father lived in New York while his asylum case was pending, according to CNN. His lawyer said he was “from a religious minority and he was fleeing persecution,” and a lawyer for her mother said she was also seeking asylum, CNN reported. Gujral told the DCNF that CNN did not ask about poverty, persecution or violence in the neighborhood “because none of them exist there. Why would a reporter whose job is to report the truth go there and not even question it?” The CNN report did not provide details regarding the claim that Gurupreet’s father faced religious persecution. “There’s something more here than meets the eye and what I’m reading in mainstream media, and I just need to follow up with the story more and find the truth for myself,” Gujral told the DCNF. Gujral said that when Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, blamed the Trump administration for separating families at the border, she felt compassion for them. Now, she wonders why “that mother who brought her child through this harrowing experience who really didn’t need to leave where she was because there was no poverty, persecution or violence, should not be held accountable for putting her child through this?” An illegal immigrant from Mexico, Maria Garcia, came to the U.S. to study, she said in the film. Maria said that she and other women and children were raped and abused by cartel members acting as coyotes, people who smuggle immigrants across the border. “A few months ago I would have absolutely voted for Biden … and I’m actually going to vote for Trump, which I never thought I would be saying, and it’s because of what I found in the movie,” Gujral told the DCNF.
Borders exist for a reason. Immigrate legally through one of the many channels we offer. If the democrats cared about the trafficking going on they'd try to streamline the process rather than abolish ICE.
ICE was created in 2002 but it was just a re-tooling of existing branches. Investigation and intelligence from customs, investigation and intelligence from the INS, and the federal protective service. It was rolled under homeland security post 2001 but its constituents existed long before it. In fact, most duties are still performed by customs and ICE is the enforcement wing. Similar to the bureau of prisons or something but significantly more powerful (owing to the fact they basically stripped most immigration authorities of their enforcement and intelligence and rolled it under ICE). You could argue that amalgamating these services is dangerous and I'd probably agree. But since they were all a part of the same branch of the government, and worked together anyway, ICE seems more of a formality than a new organization. Unlike, for example, the TSA which exists solely to give complementary colonoscopies to honest Americans.
ICE has gained way more power through its militarization and privatization of detainmet than border patrol ever could.