The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has just published an analysis of 2013 climate coverage by the three major American cable news networks. The report and data are available online, and the results are summarized in the figure below Cable news climate coverage accuracy UCS reviewed nearly 600 segments mentioning "global warming" or "climate change" across the networks' most prominent evening and weekend programs during the 2013 calendar year. Segments that contained any inaccurate or misleading representations of climate science were categorized as misleading; otherwise they were characterized as being accurate. UCS also put the misleading statements in sub-categories that reveal the problematic tendencies of each network's climate coverage. Aaron Huertas, a science communications officer at UCS who led the analysis said of the difference between network climate coverage, "Sometimes, it's like the networks are covering different planets. Unfortunately, too many politicians, interest groups, and pundits continue to dispute established climate science and cable shows sometimes give them a platform to do so." The UCS analysis found that Fox News Channel hosts and guests were the most likely to accuse scientists of manipulating or hiding climate data. Fox hosts and guests often conveyed misinformation about scientific findings, including many false claims that global warming is not occurring. http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warmin...ble-news-coverage-climate-change-science.html
What a complete bunch of derp... when the criteria for "accurate" is that you support faulty 'global warming' alarmism... and the criteria for not accurate is any skeptical statement about global warming. This type of 'analysis' from the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) is completely absurd.
I think it was the same group that marked down CNN's coverage due to CNN giving some airtime to skeptics. LOL, what a bunch of frauds.
So the above study helps explain why there are so many denialist nutters on the right. Aside from the fact that conservatives also have problems with understanding science that conflicts with their religious delusions. They generally don't like science because it tells them that God did not make Eve from Adam's rib and there is no heaven or hell.....stuff like that.
Libtards pretend to be all sciencey until it tells them life begins before the baby pops out of the womb. Then all thinking people realize that the science thingy with liberals was all just another scam they run.