NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ODNI News Release No. 11-20 April 30, 2020 Intelligence Community Statement on Origins of COVID-19 WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Office of the Director of National Intelligence today issued the following Intelligence Community (IC) statement: “The entire Intelligence Community has been consistently providing critical support to U.S. policymakers and those responding to the COVID-19 virus, which originated in China. The Intelligence Community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified. “As we do in all crises, the Community’s experts respond by surging resources and producing critical intelligence on issues vital to U.S. national security. The IC will continue to rigorously examine emerging information and intelligence to determine whether the outbreak began through contact with infected animals or if it was the result of an accident at a laboratory in Wuhan.” ### https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsr...ce-community-statement-on-origins-of-covid-19
It was widely expected. Next step we need to find if China allowed to travel exposed Chinese in purpose during January and February.
CHINA VIRUS IS MAN MADE OR INFLUENCED. THE CHINA VIRUS IS NOT FOUND IN NATURE. CHINA WAS EXPERIMENTING WITH GAIN OF FUNCTION. MAKING A VIRUS MORE INFECTIOUS. I still do not believe that the current China Virus is not man made. Originally it was thought that the virus was transmitted to humans via a certain type of bat in the wet markets of Wuhan. The virus RNA sequence found in the bat virus was a 96% match to the China Virus found in humans. It then came out that this bat was not being sold in the Wuhan market at the time. This made little difference. What was much more convincing was the fact that while there is a 96% match between China Virus in humans and the virus found in bats, the bat virus lacks the RNA coding for the protein that yields the spike that makes the current China Virus so infectious. This spike pricks the cell membrane of a healthy human cell and allows the China Virus to enter. Bat virus - No spike - had no code for spike Going through the virus data base someone came up with an animal - pangolin (anteater - I kid you not) - that has a virus that has the spike protein. However, it is only a 90% to the human China Virus. Whatever the missing 10% is, this virus found in anteater is not infectious to humans. Ideally you need some virus source that is a 99% match to the China virus found in humans. Pangolin - Not similar enough - 90% Source of virus not found in nature. Need something that is a 99% match to human China Virus and codes for the spike. SOURCE OF VIRUS MUST BE LAB The reason they are saying that The China Virus is not man made is because it is not neat enough. Example - Let's say you need to change 25 nucleotides in the bat RNA sequence to get a virus that was a closer match than 96% and contained the spike protein. The straight forward way to do this would be to splice out some part//and or add what you need. Lets say the sequence is TUCGTUCGTUGCTUGCTUGCTUGCT. The straight forward way to do this is to just add TUCGTUCGTUGCTUGCTUGCTUGCT to the RNA sequence of the bat. The actual China Virus found in humans is not this straight forward. As an example lets say it has a lot of extra TG on the front and on the back of the chain. The argument is then, since the human China Virus RNA chain is not the easiest and most straightforward way to duplicate the China Virus sequence it was not man made. I do not find this convincing enough. 1. Perhaps the lab did not want to make it obvious it was man made. If you can add stuff, you can add extra stuff. 2. Perhaps although the lab did not directly add the sequence the lab dramatically modified the environment to produce something not found in nature - a bat virus with a protein spike. The Chinese, more precisely, the people in the Wuhan Virus lab, were working on gain of function of an infectious virus. Somehow the virus got out. By now all notes and other incriminating evidence will have been destroyed. China never let anyone in the lab.
OK, if it man made, ours bio lab experts will be able to find out step-prints inside the virus. It was not found and was not modified pattern as well. You may strongly believe in conspiracy theory if it makes your better filling.
Background; following the 2002-2003 SARS coronavirus outbreak, NIH a collaboration by Chinese scientists, US military virologists from the bioweapons lab at Ft. Detrick and NIH scientists from the NIAID to prevent future coronavirus outbreaks by studying the evolution of virulent strains from bats in human tissues. Those efforts included “gain of function” research that used a process called “accelerated evolution” to create Covid Pandemic superbugs; enhanced bat born Covid mutants more lethal and more transmissable than wild COVID. Fauci’s studies alarmed scientists around the world who compalined, according to a Dec 2017 NY Times article that: “these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic” Dr. Mark Lipsitch of the Harvard School of Public Health’s Communicable Disease Center told the Times that Dr. Fauci’s NIAID experiments “have given us some modest scientific knowledge and done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemic, and yet risked creating an accidental pandemic” In October 2014, following a series of Federal laboratory mishaps that narrowly missed releasing these deadly engineered viruses, President Obama ordered a halt to all federal funding for Dr. Fauci’s dangerous experiments. It now appears that Fauci may have dodged the federal restrictions by shifting the research to the military lab in Wuhan. Congress needs to launch and investigation of NIAID’s mischief in China. Now note what the second article by Haley Kennington states: In addition to there being zero bats sold at the Chinese wet market, white papers show that in all the years of researching, studying, and yes – editing strains of the coronavirus – the virus has not had the capability of jumping from animal to human without interference by way of genome sequencing. In other words, the virus did not have the ability of being passed from animal to human until those working in the bioweapons lab edited elements of the virus that would make that possible. Though the Chinese want to place all blame on the virus originating from bats (in a seafood market no less), the science speaks for itself and it’s telling a different story. The novel coronavirus COVID-19 so closely resembles two different bat SARS-like coronaviruses that it appears COVID-19 was created through “copy and pasting” the exact amino acid similarity and cannot be a natural mutation within bats or any other mammal. Ms. Kennington goes on:The Scientist n article published in in 2015 mentions infectious-disease researcher Ralph Baric, along with the effort of his team at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s in their gain-of-function research to create a chimera, mixing the SHCO14 coronavirus spike protein from Chinese horseshoe bats with that of the SARS-CoV-1 virus. Could this be the true reason behind NIH, under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci, and during the Obama administration in 2015, awarding $3.7 million in grants to the Chinese for further research? Toward the end of her article, Ms. Kennington mentions what I personally regard may end up being a kind of Rosetta Stone to decipher this whole mess: But, what if China is only partially lying and the weaponization of the virus? What if it’s weaponization wasn’t done at the P4 bioweapon lab in Wuhan, but by the recently indicted Harvard Professor Charles Lieber who ran his own facility in exchange for a monthly payment of $50,000 by Wuhan University of Technology as a “Strategic Scientist”? The Chinese government also paid Lieber $1.5 million to set up and run the nearby lab, according to a court affidavit. “The Lieber Research Group’s website identifies its principal sponsors as NIH and DoD, including the Office of Njaval Research (“ONR”) and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (“AFOSR”). Based upon records maintained by NIH, DoD, and Harvard University, I know that the Lieber Research Group has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from NIH and DoD since 2008.” Affadavit Lieber was working on a transistor as early as 2011 that could penetrate cell membranes. Could this have been why his research and development was so important to China, Wuhan specifically? Now, putting all this together, what do we have? Well, for one thing, it's beginning to look an awfully lot like certain power-hungry and rogue elements in the American deep state teamed up with certain power-hungry and rogue elements in the Chinese deep state, and that this whole plandemic is just that, for what caught my eye in this whole thing was that President Obama ceased funding of Dr. Grouchy's project when it became clear the virus had nearly "accidentally" been released when the research was being conducted in this country. Even though it's looking more and more likely that it was released in China, but the question is, by accident? or by incompetence? or by design? If the first two, then we're dealing with a crisis of opportunity being used by the aforementioned ne'er-do-wells and a kind of "mass manslaughter", and if the latter, intentional mass murder. Either way, it's time for the state department to suspend the passports of said ne'er-do-wells, and for Dr. Grouchy to be made to answer some tough questions in President Trump's future press conferences... ... if there's anyone left in the propatainment media anymore that can put tough questions. And more importantly, these men need to be investigated to the hilt, and I mean to the hilt, and made to face civil and justice at every level, federal, state, and local, for any incompetence, accident, or deliberate planning in this whole thing that may be uncovered. In short, lawyer up Bill and Tony, you're gonna need 'em...
You don't know that it doesn't exist in nature outside of humans, however. It might. Most likely the source of the current Sars-CoV-2 virus is just another of at least seven Corona viruses that are known to infect humans. Already at least two strains of Sars-CoV-2 (the covid 19 virus) have been reported.
If you want to post crap you should at minimum give a link to the source of the crap. This is a wonderful job of taking a few facts and creating a fine work of innuendo and fiction. It's nice, but post it in the Fiction thread please..
There is no T (thymine) in RNA! Maybe you need to run your posts by a nucleic acid biochemist for editing.
You are correct. The original host that harbors a virus that is 99% identical to the human China Virus can be an animal that exists in nature and has not been found or its identity revealed. However, what reduces that probability of this animal existing is that the original host would be a mammal that reside in the Wuhan region of China. It would also be a mammal that has/does come in contact with humans. This is a reduced population size. The original host would be very valuable. I would suspect it would be worth millions of dollars and yet no one has come forth with such a mammal. No one has even made mention of a mammal other that the original bat story. The other possible candidate being offer was the pangolin but known samples are only a 90% match Information is coming out via bio lab "experts" that the source of the human China Virus is the virus lab in Wuhan. However, with the exception of saying that the virus was not man made no other details have been provided. Lab - not man made - no known natural source - ????? Again the reason the "experts" are saying that it is not man made is that the RNA nucleotide sequence that codes for the protein that codes for the spikes on the virus is not the simplest way to do it. It meanders. Example - Simple form - UCG. Form found in the human China Virus UUUUUCGGGG. This is a very simplified example. However, just because the code is not in its simplest form does not prove that it was not man made or slightly different - manifest via human influence. What research where they doing in the lab? Someone in the lab was doing gain of function research. This is where you take an existing virus and enhance the virus's performance. If it is acknowledged that the Wuhan China Virus was man made it is a more sensitive issue. Information being made available is very vague.