Maine kicks lazy bums off of public assistance

Discussion in 'Politics' started by gwb-trading, Aug 3, 2015.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Maine - A state that is leading by example. If you are an able bodied adult with no dependents and you refuse to work then no more food stamps for you. About time!

    Maine Drops 9000 From Food Stamps After They Refuse To Comply With Work Requirement

    http://www.usworldreport.com/maine-...-with-work-requirement/#.VbxXbxH77i0.facebook

    Republican Gov. Paul LePage recently began enforcing Maine’s volunteer and work requirements for food stamp SNAP recipients to keep their benefits. The end result was more than 9,000 non-disabled adults getting dropped from the program.

    The rules prevent adults who are not disabled and do not have dependents from receiving food stamps for more than three months, unless they work at least 20 hours a week, participate in a work-training program, or meet volunteer guidelines for 24 hours out of the month. Any one of those three getting met will not result in the loss of their SNAP food benefits.

    Let me emphasize. The least difficult of those three, is fulfilling an approved volunteer work load of just 24 hours out of an entire month. The hardest, is doing at least 20 hours of on the job work per week. Hey, only volunteering 24 hours per month is a seriously good deal to receive hundreds of dollars of free food. The average SNAP monthly benefit is approximately $477.88 per month for a four person household size. In most cases it’s even more. For 24 hours of volunteering, that’s making about $19.91 per hour. Nice!

    In Maine, 9,000 so-called able-bodied people who are too poor to feed themselves couldn’t handle that. Even more of a drastic measure, people in Maine who lose their benefits in such a manner can’t regain assistance for three years.

    Liberals have sold government dependence so deliberately well, that even doing 24 hours of approved volunteer work a month for a capable adult became too much for more than 9,000 people. If it seems like I’m parroting these numbers again and again, you must realize the implications are staggering. Who in their right mind would turn down such a deal? Actually wanting a member of society to be productive in some reasonable way shouldn’t be too hard to meet!


    (More at above url)
     
  2. loyek590

    loyek590

    that's about as low as it gets. How bout food stamps for everyone?
     
  3. Next step should be to deny the lazy bums a vote.

    If you're not going to pay attention and be informed, you should not be allowed to vote.... voting yourself benefits at the expense of others is immoral.

    "Every asshole gets a vote".... is one of the major causes of America's demise.
     
    Clubber Lang likes this.
  4. loyek590

    loyek590

    and you should be the one who decides who is an asshole
     
  5. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Prior to 1850 the U.S. had a requirement to own property or pay taxes in order to vote. In the view of our country's founders only these individuals were committed members of the community who should be allowed voting rights. Property and/or tax requirements for voting should be re-instated.
     
  6. loyek590

    loyek590

    well that counts me out. I sold my house and am now a renter. But I'll let my landlord know how I think he should vote.
     
  7. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Do you pay income tax? If yes, then you still qualify. The requirements were that you either owned property or paid a minimum amount in taxes.
     
  8. Agree... though the Libtards and Progressives would scream bloody murder if ever tried.
     
  9. loyek590

    loyek590

    why don't you just come out and say it, "Poor people should not be allowed to vote."
     
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    People who have no commitment to the advancement of society and are merely a taker should not be allowed to vote. All our founding fathers would expect is that any voter demonstrate their commitment by paying a small amount in taxes. Keep in mind that in keeping with historical guidelines the amount would be small enough that even those below the poverty line could vote if they were employed in a minimum wage job for at least 10 hours per week and filed income taxes.
     
    #10     Aug 3, 2015
    WeToddDid2 and Tsing Tao like this.