http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nd-page-uncovered-lead-to-more-questions.html This is bigger than watergate now.
wow. I would have thought Obama kept himself out of this. Page purchased all the presidents men to brush up on watergate. that is crazy.
"Yup. already underway too. should be a lot of things to report about the time Mueller thinks he owns the stage when it comes time for his report and legal actions right before the elections. Same with the fbi investigation. Mueller will be sharing the stage for a while. He will continue to be the star of the show, but not the only one. Especially after this week when Obama's name starts surfacing on a daily basis in regard to his role in "matters." Think you have heard the last of Susan Rice and the State Department? Think again. It's going to be non-stop" Okay tards. I am shamelessly quoting myself from yesterday or the day before. Out of my usual generosity of spirit I tried to ease you into the coming reality. No need to thank me.
Too bad that we have a Legal Monitor for an Attorney General. Mueller doesn't have to choose who to focus on. If he needs another ten people next week to open up fifteen new avenues of investigation then there is nothing to stand in his way, because he has done so much of that already. The investigation is definitely inside the Palace Walls now so it will snowball. You would need an entire team just to tack down every lead and name mentioned in the dossier. Prosecuting Steele and getting him to produce as part of a plea deal will be uber-uber-productive too. The government has him flat out on a perjury charge and he needs to be fully Muellerized.
I am not able to break away and catch up on the news until later in the day. But I imagine that as a result of this latest Page text, CNN and MSNBC are on fire calling for Obama to be investigated for obstruction of justice for attempting to meddle in the Hillary investigation. I will check later.
I was surprised at that prediction when you wrote that. But, you have been correct on many if not all your other predictions so I was not going to doubt you. Then reading some more of Pages texts today... There is a chance this was a conspiracy that goes all the way to the top. I have a question.. . Is there a chance they redacted the memo but did not admit to it? All of sudden Nunes started talking about future memo's like he had more content.
Nunes has seen much, much more than he can talk about. He has seen the original sources that his committee/nunes report was based on. He has also seen the unredacted copy of the dossier very the astronomically redacted copy that is floating around from Grassley/Graham. So he knows all the sources in that memo that are referred to as "Clinton associates" and "state department employees." In addition- and this is big but we don't have detail yet- the committee has been working for months on further investigation of the state department and their tag team relationship with the fbi in this unmasking/dossier/cover for Hillary routine- and I guess I don't need to say on a day like today- all of that happened with Obama's (I will be generous here) cooperation. Including his role in assuring that it would be leaked by lowering the security classification on it a a final dump on the way out so that the media would learn that trump people were under investigation. That nunes/committee report on the State Department chapter is coming out Friday - or the process of releasing it will surface anyway- so that will be another front that opens up. However, as with the fbi piece, Nunes sees the background investigation and sources on the state department investigation too- which gives him more information than what is in the report when it comes. Probably- as with the fbi piece- selected dems will see that background info too that supports the report or is the basis of it. So there is a lot going on and when Nunes talks about something, there are things that he has seen and will be made available to the public, and there are things that he has seen that is more than what the public has seen but has pieces that are redacted for even for him, and there are pieces where they are still fighting to have the redaction lifted. If I had to take a guess, when you heard him refer to "future memos" he was referring to the state department related memo coming out on Friday. Altogether, there are three memos planned. One is on the fbi and is out. The next one is the state department one. Coming soon. After that, and a bit further down the road, he plans to release another memo that ties the first two together and does and analysis of the collusion between all the parties and agencies, white house included. My understanding anyway. It's hard to keep up with but it is great to see some movement.