He can paint a realistic depiction of Bill Clinton flying around the world on other people's money claiming to raise awareness of poverty, but actually spending most of his 'productive' time hitting on and banging chicks younger than his daughter. Let's see a painting of that.
If I had plenty of liquid cash, I wouldn't mind hitting on and banging chicks younger than me. What's wrong with that? Especially since he's married to Mrs. Cankles, the queen of sex appeal...
The "liquid cash" is money donated to the Clinton Foundation in return for business favors for the most part. For example: "In September 2005, Frank Giustra flew Clinton to Kazakhstan as part of a three-country philanthropic tour. Clinton praised that nation's president Nursultan Nazarbayev for "this statement you have made about opening up the social and political life [of Kazakhstan]." Within two days of the meeting, Giustra's fledgling uranium company signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by the state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom. In 2006, in the months after Clinton's visit, Giustra donated $31 million to the Clinton Foundation" A good portion of the Clinton Foundation money also comes from U.S. taxpayers. Do you enjoy having your tax dollars paying for Bill Clinton to travel around and bang young chicks? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation
Even if it's true which it probably isn't ...big fucking deal. Only idiot righties care about that shit more than the important stuff . Monica? Who cares? Clinton was so much better a POTUS than Bush that it's not even funny. He is also doing so much more good now than Bush it's not even funny. Get a clue moron. Wow you are dumb.
I scanned it pretty quick, but I don't see anywhere where it says any of the foundation's funds are disbursed to the Clinton's as a salary or other form of compensation or reimbursement. Any money the Clinton's contributed to the foundation in the past is no longer "theirs". It's the foundations. So it's not like they can just write themselves a check without it being a taxable event... I read the Contributors' list. It appears most of the funds come from private companies and citizens. Nothing directly from the US Government. Read this link - no mention of any contributions by the US gov't. So I think it's a stretch to say he's using taxpayer money via the foundation for his extracurricular activities. Maybe it's taxable income from the foundation, but it's not taxpayer money. While I believe most 503(c) non-profit charities are scams designed to enrich the organizers and managers while paying lip service (and a few bucks) to helping the named beneficiary(s), I think the amount of taxes GE, Apple, et al save resulting from their "invoice for services" shell games with their foreign subsidiaries is magnitudes larger... The there's Big Pharma drugging everybody into submission with fake diseases and conditions, and reaping the benefits in the form of 100+x margins...