Once again the neo nazis at the Daily News are advocating the disarmament of the citizenry just like Hitler did before he executed all his enemies? Especially the NRA. Is that good enough for you? I can go as far as you/they can go
FC you are one dumb bastard. I have no doubt that if some Jihadi shoves a bayonet right into your belly you'd still be surprised as he was doing it. With your dying breathe you'd be mumbling, gee, I didn't see that coming.
Hey that's funny coming from a conservative gun nut. The very definition of dumb bastard. lol You do know that the above is the actual front page of the Daily News right? And the NY Times has this on their front page. Unusual for an editorial to be there. It is a moral outrage and national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. By THE EDITORIAL BOARDDEC. 4, 2015 All decent people feel sorrow and righteous fury about the latest slaughter of innocents, in California. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are searching for motivations, including the vital question of how the murderers might have been connected to international terrorism. That is right and proper. But motives do not matter to the dead in California, nor did they in Colorado, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut and far too many other places. The attention and anger of Americans should also be directed at the elected leaders whose job is to keep us safe but who place a higher premium on the money and political power of an industry dedicated to profiting from the unfettered spread of ever more powerful firearms. It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection. America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday. They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism. Opponents of gun control are saying, as they do after every killing, that no law can unfailingly forestall a specific criminal. That is true. They are talking, many with sincerity, about the constitutional challenges to effective gun regulation. Those challenges exist. They point out that determined killers obtained weapons illegally in places like France, England and Norway that have strict gun laws. Yes, they did. But at least those countries are trying. The United States is not. Worse, politicians abet would-be killers by creating gun markets for them, and voters allow those politicians to keep their jobs. It is past time to stop talking about halting the spread of firearms, and instead to reduce their number drastically — eliminating some large categories of weapons and ammunition. Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership. It is possible to define those guns in a clear and effective way and, yes, it would require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens. What better time than during a presidential election to show, at long last, that our nation has retained its sense of decency? http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/op...op-region&_r=0
LOL, not even a week after the NY Daily news was chastising conservatives for their rhetoric against planned parenthood, and they print a cover page calling wayne lapierre a terrorist. Is there any wonder why no one takes the left seriously anymore?
And they can't bring themselves to call the muslims that shot up the place in California a bunch of terrorists, but if forced to, they'll only do it if they can also call Wayne the NRA guy a terrorist, too. Sickos
News about a gun restricted place getting shot up is a real yawner. I always want to just know 1) what psych med was the shooter on and 2) what gun free zone did he shoot up. In this recent case in California it wasn't a psych med, it was muzziebrain... the shooter hated a Born-Again Jew and told him he was going to be killed. Nobody was armed even in the face of some shithead muzzie threatening the life of somebody so there 'ya go. I just can't really see how anybody can get emotionally worked up about this shit, it's a mismanaged situation by the Left, what else is new? I'm rather newly arrived to South Texas so I don't really know but I think that if a muzziebrain shithead issued a life threat he might get offed for it. It seems likely he would if he produced a weapon. Texas hosted the Draw Mohammed art contest and had to shoot two terrorists. The officer that did the shooting said "they didn't like our First Amendment so we introduced them to our Second Amendment". I'm not sure somebody could even do that in California without Barbara Boxer or some other leftbrain shithead jumping down his throat and bringing the whole legal system with her... Between muzziebrain and leftbrain I'm not sure where we're going with all this...
well then it's settled, it's us against them, no more need for dialog or listening to opposing views, it's just kill or be killed. I like, it. It's simple. Easy to remember.