more misdirection from the troll. hey troll- NASA science says CO2 is one of the most efficient coolants in the upper atmosphere ... so claiming co2 is greenhouse gas... does not mean adding more of it causes warming... how many fricken times do you need to read that? troll. now produce the science you quoted above... where is the science showing adding co2 causes warming...
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ASb3G6QU2tk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Where is the science showing evolution is true? There is lot's of science showing CO2 causes warming, That's why it's called a greenhouse gas you stupid lying twisted piece of shit. Will you EVER understand the most basic bedrock principles of climate science you psychotic douchebag?
But is this level of green house gas going to cause us to melt, and die? Don't think so al gore jr...
1. present any of the science your troll liar -any of the science showing adding more co2 to our environment is causing warming. I predict you will not... because there isn't any. 2. You are not going to start that evolution crap again are you? Go ahead drone... show us the science that life evolved from non life here on the earth. While I believe we have had evolution of living things... I know for a fact we have no proof of evolution of non life into life. Were you one of the idiot leftist drones like stu on elitetrader who insisted there was proof of evolution from non life to life here on earth?
George Will on 'Climate Change' and In General: When Pols Say 'Debate Is Over,' It Really Means 'They're Losing It' By Tom Blumer | February 16, 2014 Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-bl...t-really-means-theyre-losing-it#ixzz2taQRSAa3
And when one side gets irrational and starts name-calling and denigrating the opposition, it really means "they're losing"... Like FC.... FC, someone, somewhere has probably reserved a stake for you. With plenty of carbon-releasing kindling to give it a nice, sparkly, heart-warming, feet-toasting glow. Oh, the irony....
Jem, what is a greenhouse gas and what does it do. Where is the proof that evolution is true? "Were you one of the idiot leftist drones like stu on elitetrader" ?????????? So it's true then. You work for the Heritage Foundation spreading lies and deceit about AGW on multiple message boards. You piece of lying shit.
This explains jem's douchey behavior and the ignorance and delusions of many on the right about AGW.... "Conservative groups may have spent up to $1bn a year on the effort to deny science and oppose action on climate change, according to the first extensive study into the anatomy of the anti-climate effort. The anti-climate effort has been largely underwritten by conservative billionaires, often working through secretive funding networks. They have displaced corporations as the prime supporters of 91 think tanks, advocacy groups and industry associations which have worked to block action on climate change. Such financial support has hardened conservative opposition to climate policy, ultimately dooming any chances of action from Congress to cut greenhouse gas emissions that are warming the planet, the study found. âI call it the climate-change counter movement,â said the author of the study, Drexel University sociologist Robert Brulle. âIt is not just a couple of rogue individuals doing this. This is a large-scale political effort.â Brulle's study, published on Friday in the journal Climatic Change, offers the most definitive exposure to date of the political and financial forces blocking American action on climate change. Still, there are big gaps. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/dec/20/conservative-groups-1bn-against-climate-change
have collectively spent, on average, a billion dollars a year, in order to fool the American public into thinking that climate change isn't happening, and that, even if it is, it's not caused by burning fossil fuels. These aristocrats control fossil fuels corporations, such as Koch Industries, and ExxonMobil, but their money for this mass-deception campaign is laundered through far-right-wing foundations they control, to think-tanks they control, which, in turn, buy professors to provide "authority" for these distortions and outright lies. That is why the reality (a graphical presentation of which can be seen at places such as this ), though acknowledged by virtually all climatologists, is rejected, just disbelieved, by much of the public. They, in turn, pay professors and journalists to write, both for the "news media," and for professional journals, to debunk or (in the scholarly publications) to raise questions about, global warming or its cause -- questions that are no longer even questions among actual climate scientists. http://www.opednews.com/articles/Bi...Change_Climate-Change-Deniers-131230-552.html