Criminals don't give receipts. Obviously they made the money trail as complicated as possible with all of the different shell corps and accounts.
You still haven't shown a single case where Biden influenced any policy, what exactly is the criminality of family members making money?
Attorney General Merrick Garland has appointed Trump appointee David Weiss to be special counsel overseeing investigations into Hunter Biden. Garland had long insisted Weiss had the authority he needed to investigate Hunter Biden without special counsel status. This is the difference between Democrats and Republicans, imagine a Republican remotely doing the same.
Garland didn't do that until there was a big stink in the media and a federal judge nixed the Hunter Biden plea deal. Now Weiss is free to bring cases outside of Delaware. He tried to do that before, but the local US Attorneys wouldn't give their permission.
Because the Trump appointee was investigating Hunter, what more do you guys want here? Your Trump appointed prosecutor said that there was no bias, how much independent can an investigator get? So can we have a special counsel for Trump's son in law and his 2 billion deal? Or criminality only works one way?
What account was used to pay all of Joes living expenses Did it come from one of the shell LLC's set up If Joe's influence was used to get money and that money went to his family and Joe never received any money, that is still corruption
Why are you people asking questions when you supposedly have all the bank records? Joe's tax returns are public, surely you can find out if he got paid. First, using influence isn't corruption - that's straight up lobbying which isn't illegal. If Joe changed policies for money, that would be corruption and after 2 years of investigation, you guys can't produce a single example. Even your Shokin talking point was demolished by Archer.