If that's all you can find wrong with my post I will consider that we are in agreement on the broader topic.
Yeah, he edited it, but he still left the context that Epstein is another setup "like Assange." C'mon Man, you're going to align yourself with these sickos?
Listen, man. I'm not aligning myself with anyone. You are making a serious accusation on someone who I had the impression would never make such commentary. That commentary doesn't exist in any form I can find it. All I'm trying to do is follow the logic before writing someone off. I've never seen any other instance that would lead me to believe what you were saying would or even could occur. If what you say is true I would certainly not defend it. Edit: How he left it doesn't look like a defense of Epstein at all, but an indication that he believes the media will try to defend Epstein if it goes deeper and some of them are implicated.
And yet here I am rubbing elbows with all you educated sophisticates. You're like the neighbor down the street who hates the fact that I live in a house just as nice as his. My money spends bro, just like yours, and that is all that matters here in Merica.
On my kid's lives he stated, "they are having sex anyway" which precipitated a massive response from the sensible here. The latter post, which you cite, was toned-down and reflects his beliefs that Epstein is being railroaded like his hero Assange. Just search ET for AAA's comments on Assange.
Not you specifically. I'm sure you are much more well off than me, and much more intelligent. You spend endless hours reminding us all of that. Edit. And you bench more too. Impressive.