Not sure what is fake about my post. "Involved" means that its considered a legitimate asset classs. Ray Dalio said the other day I think that everyone should have a 15% allocation. Now clearly some people still recommend long term treasuries as a viable asset class, so people can still consider bitcoin to be crap like I consider long term USTs to be crap. But nobody is going to go after you anymore for owning Bitcoin. Trump, Vance, and I'm sure most politicians own bitcoin, so to still be worried about it from regulatory framework is just dump. I'm not sure what your point is. Was it a bad move to put all your money into bitcoin 10 years ago when it was 520?? Obviously not. Is it a good idea to do it now? I guess we will see.
The white house PR team is going crazy right now on crypto. Like are they really trying to hold it up or are they distributing the tokens to the suckers?
$MARA CEO (bitcoin mining company) called the top on $btc, saying it will implode from treasuries selling BTC Takes one to know one, the MARA CEO is max griffter extracting $40M+ monthly, almost as much as NVDA CEO. I am of the same opinion. We are putting in a generational top.