Your explanation would have worked if it wasn't for the fact that Trump is on record saying Russian investigation was the reason and contradicted the AG reasoning which said Comey was unfair to Hillary - which is again contradicted by Trump's own statements. Secondly, you said something about wrongful investigation and now you are saying he should be investigated for it. So were you just speculating earlier WITHOUT EVIDENCE? LOL After all these days complaining about EVIDENCE, you baselessly speculate and then even speculate about guilt!!! My sides!!!! Holy shit!!!
Comey testimony: FBI Director James Comey told Congress Wednesday that revealing the reopening of the Hillary Clinton email probe just before Election Day came down to a painful, complicated choice between "really bad" and "catastrophic" options. He said he'd felt "mildly nauseous" to think he might have tipped the election outcome but in hindsight would change nothing. So here we have a man racked with guilt that he may have torpedoed the Hillary campaign. What's to say that he did not go on a one man vendetta to try and right this perceived wrong? Jimmy boy cannot just arbitrarily begin his own "unauthorized" investigations. He absolutely did have a legal obligation to turn over his "notes" to all investigative bodies, including his associates at the FBI, at the time of the conversation in question. Secondly, how do we know what was said in during the entirety of said conversation? Did he bait the president into saying something that taken out of context could be construed as improper? Entrapment anyone? Yes, this looks more and more like it was Comey who abused the authority of his office and has attempted to do harm, harm with intent and malice, to bring down the Trump presidency.
Interesting that your own gnashing of the teeth makes you laugh till your sides hurt. The assistant AG had his reasons, Trump had his. Either of those reasons would be sufficient to fire "staff". Either reason could stand alone, or together. Only SNL, and it's duped laughees, would think that putting out one reason before the other is significant. Fact is, the Russia-hacked-into-our-voting-machines investigation is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. The investigation of Flynn was SUPPOSEDLY related to that theme, adding another level of bogus-ness to a wrongful investigation, if there was an investigation. If there was not an investigation, Comey was slow in making that clear to the public, and why. It's OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE because it obstructs the investigation into the murder of Seth Rich, and the pedophilia of John Podesta, and the actual crimes of the DNC, besides the general embarrassment it causes to the DNC. It was the DNC that first floated this DISTRACTION, and it was wrongful for the FBI to take political bait like that. So, no, Comey was not doing a good job, politically compromised by propaganda, and riding that wave as long as possible to extend his tenure. In the end, Comey was betting that if he maintained the illusion he might be investigating the president, or anyone around him, he could skate based on the charges you are making now, "obstruction of justice". It eventually backfired, and he was fired, and rightfully so.
Because you don't seem to get the hilarity of it. You whined and whined that there is NO EVIDENCE of collusion even though there are multiple investigations into Trump-Russia but not only you don't have any EVIDENCE of a wrongful investigation Comey supposedly conducted - you don't even know there was an INVESTIGATION itself but you are very happy speculating about Comey's guilt. Maybe you didn't think through things? Except the administration said that the justification was the memo and then Trump says that he decided to fire and then he asked them to find a justification. Lying part is significant or are you saying that the Trump administration is separate from Trump? Total nonsense, the investigation into Flynn was his bribes and being a foreign agent, nothing to do with Russians hacking. So when did DNC/Clinton/Podesta ask any law enforcement professional to stop investigating these? That's obstruction, so where is your evidence? Any reporting? Again, Flynn is being investigated by the Senate Intelligence Committee, are they maintaining an illusion too? All the evidence against Flynn that led to grand jury subpoena is an illusion? What?
So he said he was mildly nauseous and you are translating that to 'racked with guilt' and then making up more stuff. You do realize that grand jury subpoenas were issued against Flynn and that the DOJ approved the investigation against Flynn? What are you guys even talking about. He did, didn't you read the reporting. So Trump asks him to end Flynn investigation after asking Sessions and Pence to leave but it's Comey who is abusing his authority because he filed that conversation. I can't even believe I am reading this!!!
He hasn't done anything yet but looked at a democrat the wrong way. You are taking up an offense for me and bewildered that I am not offended. I'm sorry you feel so betrayed that Trump lied to you. I'm glad he is not doing the specific things he promised. I don't agree with most of them. I agree that we need to start approaching problems from the USA point of view. Perhaps that is what scares the Canadians. Kansas is a beautiful state. They aren't making land like that anymore. I see no difference between a democrat, a communist and a socialist. They all cling to a failed idea. Buy low sell high, that is natures way and should need very little interference or assistance from government. Our greatest national asset is our individuals, and we always need more of them. There, now you can get back to herding your cats.
Even if there were a memo and even if what was written on it was what has been said in the media, it would Comey that would need to be indicted for obstruction of justice due to his sheer reticence.
I've been done with the hoax Seth Rich story for quite some time. Now I'm back to the same Russian collusion hoax story you've been going on about for quite some time. Unless you can show a single case (third request, now) where an FBI personal memo led to the conviction of any individual, anywhere for any crime, without any other evidence, then you're full of shit (as usual).
So it's Democrat's fault that he tried to obstruct justice? The guy is funding the ISIS the way Obama did, but of course you are not offended Yes because that's what we were talking about - stat's georgraphy You do understand that Trump got elected on the promise of massive government intervention yes? You just talk in circles and cliches, you address no specifics or even talk about any facts. And by the way, the cliches you are reporting are ideas put in your head by someone, these are not original, it's just cultural brainwashing.