Cancer is one disease. There are many secondary pathways to getting cancer, but there is only one primary cause: chronic damage to the cells' mitochondria. When that happens, the affected cells switch from respiration to fermentation in order to produce ATP molecules. The cell's apoptosis mechanism is turned off and growth factors become uncontrolled. So YES, I think you're going to see more cases of cancer related to 5G as it could very well be a source of long term damage to the mitochondria. Anyone who thinks that is BS is just ignorant of the biology of cancer. Sorry, but cancer is NOT a nuclear genetic disease. It has nothing to do with gene mutations within the nucleus. That is a downstream effect, not the cause. Ever wonder why you don't hear of people getting cancer of a muscle or neuron? It's because those specific cells do not have the ability to ferment long-term. They will just die upon damage. All of you should read-up. Thomas Seyfried is the name you're looking for (on YouTube). He also has a book about the subject, written in 2012.
Can't see any evidence to support 3G or 4G or Wifi has increased cancer rates. I see 5G runs upto 95Ghz, us army uses 96ghz for crowd control, much more directed power output still only penetrates very outter skin layer.
After several childhood cancer cases at one school, parents question radiation from cell tower https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cell-t...ts-link-to-several-cases-of-childhood-cancer/ Under normal usage conditions; however, what is the absolute maximum output of a typical 5G point? At absolute maximum output, could it hurt someone? I doubt that it could crank out x-rays, but microwaves? 500GHz?
No it wouldn't. Those antennas can focus it down with sub-millimeter precision. It IS heat technically, but the effect is more like cutting.
Don't be. It lowers your risk of disease A LOT. Also, they did it while you were young enough that you don't remember it. Although other people say the trauma of circumcision is why most people don't remember their early youth...