Climate models have performed quite well..

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, Feb 23, 2014.

  1. jem

    jem

    http://junksciencearchive.com/Hide_the_decline.html


    from the UN Nutters themselves.... IPCC FAR page 202, graphic 7c (IPCC, 1990)


    [​IMG]



     
    #51     Feb 25, 2014
  2. Crap chart, stops before 1990, from a fraud website, what data set? Corals? Why do you always go for the shit and propaganda sites when NOAA is the most authoritative source in the world? Don't you know how to spell NOAA?

    This is the best chart....and if you really want the truth, multiple proxies authors and studies.


    [​IMG]

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/medieval.html
     
    #52     Feb 25, 2014
  3. This is a good set to get a good overview.

    [​IMG]
     
    #53     Feb 25, 2014
  4. The above charts and the fact that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and the fact that levels of it have gone up 40% due to man leads to the inescapable conclusion that 97% of climatologists agree on. One would have to an idiot not to think so. The science and evidence is so simple and obvious.
     
    #54     Feb 25, 2014
  5. CO2 is what every plant needs. Warmists are plant murdering plantphobics! Their speech should be outlawed!
     
    #55     Feb 25, 2014

  6. Yes but the resulting floods drought cold and heat - extreme weather - from GW will be very bad for crops. The rate of temp rise means the old growth forests are going to be toast. The acidification of the oceans will mean destruction of the coral reefs and collapse of the marine ecosystems. All told, a third of all species may go extinct.
     
    #56     Feb 25, 2014
  7. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #57     Feb 26, 2014
  8. jem

    jem

    #58     Feb 26, 2014
  9. jem

    jem

    great article showing the IPCC before an after and the hide the decline tricks played by agw nutters...

    http://junksciencearchive.com/Hide_the_decline.html

    from what I just read... this is how the IPCC had the temperature record in the second report... fraudcurrents charts are what happened by the third report.

    [​IMG]
     
    #59     Feb 26, 2014
  10. Old charts using only stalagtites as proxy. Fraudulent lies from you and bullshit websites. Again. Fuck you liar. Try NOAA.

    [​IMG]
     
    #60     Feb 26, 2014