Guess why nytimes is posting this btw...The claim is she voted for a Republican, yet they ignore the illegals voting for Democrats. You should be mad as hell and want a border wall just as much as I do.
Some of these illegal immigrants are very successful as construction workers. They have the money to buy identities from other Hispanics. This is expensive but since it is not a stolen identity then the odds of getting busted are much lower. If they don't have the money to make that work then the next option is to buy a stolen identity. The next step below that is to steal an identity directly. The safest and cheapest (maybe even free) option is for one family member to "loan" their identity to someone else temporarily so they can get legal with payroll wherever they work.
So out of millions of votes a few suspected cases can be found and some suspected cases are republicans voting illegally.You are a long way from proving anything close to millions of illegal votes.
That Miami Herald article proves that Democrats want to sign up illegals to vote. How many Russians voted illegally in the election? Damn you are up late, what part of the world are you in? You ain't in America buddy and I doubt you are an American. I would have figured you would have been fired by now since your propaganda of posting bogus polling data persuaded no one. You failed. Maybe Soros kept you around to sweep the floors??? Go take your Soros check and post elsewhere.
Again,no proof of millions of illegal votes.Don't feel to bad though,even Trump and other republican officials can't prove it and they have far more resources than you.
Keep up the good work fighting the misinformation from tony. my work is done. I give up posting here til Easter.
LOL, we might add that there's not only no proof that trump's campaign had anything to do with russian intrusion into the dnc emails, there's not even proof that the russians did it. And the nsa and cia have far more resources than anyone else on the planet, yet they wouldn't even vouch for the info doc that was made public when proof was demanded. The header at the top of their analysis disclaimed any warranty to it. LOL