Dems use disinformation from Russia to attack Trump

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Jul 12, 2017.

  1. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    NONE of that stops Chaffetz from ORDERING investigations by an EXECUTIVE agency - that's how we got into this debate if your senile brain can remember.

    My very first response on the matter

    How the fuck is having the authority to ask FBI to conduct an investigation same as CONDUCTING THEIR OWN INVESTIGATIONS which OF COURSE Boehner could control - because he controls the FUNDING.

    "Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart .
     
    #51     Jul 13, 2017
  2. jem

    jem

    how the hell could you be acting like you know Boehner was not controlling this stuff when you have absolutely nothing to back your lying ass up.
     
    #52     Jul 13, 2017
  3. jem

    jem

    below is the stupid lie you started with... that I objected to. somehow to cover up your lying ass... you bring all the tangential red herring crap to try and get out of your troll lie.

    Just admit you had no basis for making your stupid comment because you get paid to write shit whether its true or not.

    i don't care if you think federal investigation... morphs into order FBI vs boehner pays for it.

    you lied... you were caught...

    you are a kook and a troll.

     
    #53     Jul 13, 2017
  4. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Do you understand the difference between a FEDERAL INVESTIGATION vs a CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION which is what you linked to in the Atlantic article?

    You are pathetically ignorant.
     
    #54     Jul 13, 2017
  5. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    How the fuck does Boehner control Chaffetz request for an FBI investigation. In fact, even Democrats can request a federal investigation into someone as minority members, Speaker doesn't have any control over that.
     
    #55     Jul 13, 2017
  6. jem

    jem

    let me put this is a near binary form so you understand it. all those other arguments you are making are tangential crap you are making up to avoid the truth.

    You must answer yes or no for you own sanity.

    Did you make the statement quoted below?

    If yes.. .you are caught lying again.
    If no... you need meds

     
    #56     Jul 13, 2017
  7. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Proceed on WHAT?

    What was I referring to?

    Is it not important that you remember what I was talking about in my very first post and subsequent posts?

    I started this line of argument by talking about a FBI investigation, I again mentioned a FEDERAL investigation and explained again and again when and where a Speaker can step in.

    You read one line and think I said ABSOLUTE authority, your dis-ingenuousness is not my problem. You tried the same tactic with the DELETED Seth Rich story, you tried the same with the 'PEER REVIEWED' paper story. you only see what you want to see.
     
    #57     Jul 13, 2017
  8. jem

    jem

    how do we know exgopper is lying?
    he is typing.

    answer my question above... yes or no.
    it will lead you back on the path to integrity.

    keep going down this path of lies and covering with more lies and you will snap.

     
    #58     Jul 14, 2017
  9. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    I answered your question, you just don't want to admit that I debunked your ignorant claims
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2017
    #59     Jul 14, 2017
  10. jem

    jem

    once again...

     
    #60     Jul 14, 2017