Oh Capt Oblivious.....did you even read the article? A reminder here that the education correlation is among whites only. Nonwhites may have other priorities in assessing Mr. Trump.
Exactly, which is why I really wish the media would quit using it as a way to insult people, but if they're going to do it at least lets be honest about which party is more is more likely to receive/benefit these "uneducated" votes. That is where the heart of the problem lies. More misinformation from the media.
You don't really believe this do you? I mean, we only have about 2 million farmers in the US and we produce 10% of the worlds food. India has 200 million farmers and also produces 10% of the worlds food. You don't think its that way simply because our land is better do you? It's because our farmers are educated. Most have farming degrees.
Have you seen the recent bunch of 'college educated whites?" Bunch of faggot pussies scared of words and seeking out safe spaces. I trust their double major in French and Art History will do them well while they make $8.75 an hour and pour me a double cortado at the local cafe. Is this supposed to be some aspirational group?
There are what I term low information voters on both sides. I would say that on the Democrat side there exists a coalition of specific issue voters (many Hispanic and black voters may fall into this category) women, millennials and college educated voters. On the Republican side there are also many specific issue voters. These seem to be weighted toward white men. This is no doubt due in large part because Trump has going out of his way to alienate Hispanic, black and women voters. Neither side has enough intellectual or wealthy voters aligned with it to make much difference. You can not win a general election in the U.S. by alienating women, Hispanics and blacks. And it would be especially difficult, I would think, to win with a campaign centered on ad hominem attacks and accusations rather than on issues of concern to the voters; despite the galvanizing effect accusations (the wilder the better) have on your core constituents. (Oddly, in political campaigns, the truth or untruth of a accusation hurled at an opponent seems to play no part, as all accusations are true in the minds of a candidate's supporters.) Insulting those in your own party, whose help you will need to succeed, will make your task more difficult still. There may never have been a candidate for President in U.S. history that was more inarticulate nor more shallow than Donald Trump in discussing specific issues, and that would include the extremely inarticulate George W. Bush.
Me thinks you generalize too much... How about this group of Science & Engineering majors from UMass.
IF "uneducated whites" in the USA support Trump more than Hillary, my thinking is because they do not make money they want to have. So they love Trump because he blames hispanics and black peoples for the so many troubles in the USA. So those white people want to blame hispanics, blacks, foreigners for their own life. Trump play them for the fool. Just like he play the Trump University students to get rich.