Earn2Trade Founder Charged With Fraud

Discussion in 'Prop Firms' started by LCK2000, Sep 10, 2020.

  1. #31     Sep 11, 2020
  2. destriero

    destriero


    Are your for fucking real? WHY DOES IT MATTER?

    OK, I'll assume that you're genuinely just stupid and not trolling.

    If you're on a simulator it's because the intent is to earn subscription revenue. They operate with the intention of NOT paying out. They are operating a subscription service in which 100% of their revs are in "selling the dream" to you pikers.

    Interested skeptics wouldn't enter their CC digits if there wasn't some superficial legitimacy to the product. Sure thing, Bro! We hook you up with an FCM! The fact that they are offering access to an unregistered prop-firm should give you pause. What recourse do you have as a co-conspirator?

    There are a million+ methods to program the sim-feed to make it unprofitable.

    Do you think that Ryan Masten or whatever was on the up and up while running this outfit? You don't think he cut his teeth on this scam before offering the Israeli product? He was running the binary scam shop while running Earn2Trade. That's not in dispute.

    It's analogous to unregulated online video poker, 21, etc. Share of the profits they generate in their trading activities? IF they are sim-trading when ostensibly "funded" then there are no profits to share. WTF dude, insert critical thinking >here<.

    It's binary. If they are sim throughout, from combine to "funded", then it's a scam. If they are unregulated it's a scam. It's a scam.

    You sir are the ideal candidate.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2020
    #32     Sep 11, 2020
  3. qlai

    qlai

    I disagree. There’s no point for these companies to support real trading operations, which is costly, when they know 98% will fail within a year. It’s a way to filter out gamblers at low cost. Once a person passes their tests, he/she will get a shot with prop firm. I don’t know for a fact what they do, but it would make sense.

    BTW, as far as I am concerned, if a person passes the tests, he/she had accomplished something meaningful REGARDLESS if they get funding or not! At the least, it’s a confidence booster necessary to continue the journey. Should be worth every penny.
     
    #33     Sep 11, 2020
    Onra likes this.
  4. destriero

    destriero

    If "funded traders" are on sim then the goal of the firm is to bust the traders as soon as is humanely possible. Sim = trading AGAINST the House. Jesus.
     
    #34     Sep 11, 2020
  5. Well I was being sarcastic when I said why does it matter because of course I KNOW WHY IT F’ING MATTERS

    but Thank you for detailing for all as I preferred that you post this

     
    #35     Sep 11, 2020
  6. destriero

    destriero


    Bullshit. 1. Offering the product to the ppl that blow-out would be a bit too obvious. There has to be some superficial legitimacy. As in they are not e-Toro or whatever. Their marks understand that the E-Mini trades at the CME which requires an FCM; or in this case the scam, unregulated "prop firm."

    2. You've accomplished nothing on sim. Further, you could have opened a demo account at IB or TDA and followed their bankroll mgmt.
     
    #36     Sep 11, 2020
    trader221 likes this.
  7. destriero

    destriero

    You outlined your position that "as long as they pay timely..."

    You think that I am concerned with what Earn2Trade will do? Bring it. I am just pissed enough to pursue this with regulatory.
     
    #37     Sep 11, 2020
    eternaldelight likes this.
  8. Yes —my whole post was sarcastic including “as long as they pay timely”



     
    #38     Sep 11, 2020
  9. destriero

    destriero

    Have you read your posts? You look the fool and now you're backpedaling and trying to save face. You are incapable of sarcasm. Retarded piker blocked.
     
    #39     Sep 11, 2020
    traderjo likes this.
  10. traderjo

    traderjo

    Yah sure to save their backside nto to look after the consumer!
    Regulations are there so that if you take money from people under pretext of anything and then offer a financial product to trade then you need to be scrutinized teh tarders perhaps need to have passed SEC exams etc..

    "provide service with understanding that 98% of your customers will fail." LOL if that is the motive then how is it good for general consumer..? I bet these companies don't say that their motive is to see 98% fail! OMG
     
    #40     Sep 11, 2020
    destriero likes this.