I'm not the one who runs and hides when a logical question is posed to them. You know, just because you call it science, doesn't make it so.
You are stupid. This reminds me of the science showing conservatives are less intelligent than conservatives.
Conservatives are less intelligent than conservatives, eh? Sounds like a great, informative study. I'm sure that "science" was on the same level as the "science" you have put forth for Global Warming.
You and your right wing buddies here are just more evidence. The science of AGW is so obvious a that ten year old can understand it, but conservatives can't. The reason for that is that conservatives are dumb. It's really that simple.
If a ten year can truly understand it, why can't you explain it? Children believe in all sorts of things - my five year old thinks there is a tooth fairy. I'll bet I could give him that classic gag about the thermostat you posted in the other thread, and he'd fall for it, too.
"conservatives are less intelligent than conservatives." What does that mean? Rank/Average IQ 48. California 94.9 (blue state) 49. New Mexico 94.8 (blue) 50. Mississippi 93.8 (red) (37% black) 51. District of Columbia 91.2 (blue)
So anyway, asset seizures. They're very doable. The example on a national scale, that of the Italians vs. the mafia, shows that once a society de-legitimizes the target, the action is legitimate. I came across this Italian example because I was looking for a link to their other asset seizure, where they simply raided bank accounts (not necessarily mafia) over a certain balance.
it's not about whether or not they're 'doable'. It's about it being wrong in every way: legally, ethically, morally, philosophically and any other lly i missed. Seizing the assets of an ILLEGAL enterprise is not comparable to stealing the legally acquired assets of private individuals, that is just mob envy + corrupt politicians. Anyone who can rationalize outright theft just cause some crooked lawmakers say it's ok, is a fucking scumbag.