Fact Checker: The repeated, incorrect claim that Russia obtained '20 percent of our uranium'

Discussion in 'Politics' started by exGOPer, Oct 31, 2017.

  1. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    Exactly.If what Barrasshole said was true its illegal and a slam dunk conviction.Why is Trump tweeting about the uranium deal rather than having his DOJ prosecute such an easy case:confused:
     
    #21     Oct 31, 2017
    exGOPer likes this.
  2. jem

    jem

    1. obama wanted iran to have uranium
    2. clinton got paid 140 million
    3. podesta got paid
    4. manaforte may have been involved
    5. money got spread around
    6. muller, comey, mccabe and rosenstein may all have not briefed congress.

    so who the hell do you think was going to investigate?
    it took the hill article last week to get the swamp fired up.


    your post is the exact reason we want the swamp cleaned and trump got elected.

    welcome to logic.

     
    #22     Oct 31, 2017
  3. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    [​IMG]
     
    #23     Oct 31, 2017
  4. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    More blather

    1. So?

    2. Lie. A Canadian with no stake in the company donated to CF.

    3. So?

    4. Speculation and LIE

    5. Speculation and LIE

    6. Speculation and LIE.

    Trump's DOJ and Trump's FBI had a year to start an investigation

    They STILL can start an investigation, you are linking to 'evidence' from months and years ago. If none of that led to an investigation, why would anyone believe there is any there there?

    It's a very simple question.
     
    #24     Oct 31, 2017
  5. jem

    jem

    so now that we know you were lying your ass off you want to switch gears to review what I explained....

    lets do so...

    while it may be speculation... you have no basis for calling it a lie...
    here is just one of the stories which support what I explained.

    and don't forget I already gave you the New York times and other sources...
    so you anticipated cry of fox news does not work.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...t_trump_central_figures_in_mueller_probe.html


    FOX News' Tucker Carlson said he has a source who told him that the Podesta brothers and Paul Manafort are the "central figures" Robert Mueller's investigation, not President Trump. The source, Carlson said, told him about events that implicate Manafort, the Podesta brothers, Hillary Clinton and her State Department, and Russian oligarchs. The source has been interviewed by Mueller's independent investigators.

    "If true," Carlson said, the story weaved by the source shows the media is focusing on the wrong Russia story.

    The source tells Tucker Carlson that Paul Manafort worked extensively with the Podesta Group as far back as 2011 on behalf of Russia. Manafort's Russian associates wanted to influence Washington and sought the Podesta brothers because of their ties to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

    He said then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton held a meeting with the Podestas that included a representative of the Clinton Foundation that specifically was about how to assist Uranium One in a deal that reportedly netted the foundation $100 million in donations.

    "Sometimes, our source said, ties between The Podesta Group and the Clintons were explicit," Carlson explained. "Tony Podesta spoke regularly to Hillary Clinton while she ran the State Department. Our source remembers Podesta's assistant announcing that 'Secretary Clinton is on the line.'"


     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2017
    #25     Oct 31, 2017
  6. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    That NYTimes piece was from nearly 2 years ago - if there was absolutely any illegality, what has stopped Republicans in Congress or Trump's DOJ to investigate this?

    Given your SPECULATION, it's a slam dunk, why isn't Trump's DOJ and FBi investigating it?

    Tucker Carlson is a paid propagandist, he is directly paid by Trump and is not a reliable source to believe his 'anonymous source'. Guy has zero credibility.

    Also, he is repeating the same lie that you do, Guestra a CANADIAN is presented as an investor of the company when he was not. If this was a slam dunk case, you guys won't be spreading fake news.

    Carlson has a source in Mueller's investigation!!!!!!! And yet he has never had a scoop about it EVER.. So believable
     
    #26     Oct 31, 2017
  7. jem

    jem

    you keep asking why the swamp is not investigating... as if that means it did not happen.

    are you on drugs?
    are you paid to be a clown?

    the investigations have started... but I don't expect the establishment republican clown show to get anywhere.

    to have results we need an unbiased special counsel.
    you understand that right?
     
    #27     Oct 31, 2017
  8. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    Of course, play it both ways.

    Claim it's a slam dunk and then say that nobody would touch the slam dunk case because they are the swamp

    So Trump is swamp now?

    There is NO DOJ or FBI investigation, the Benghazi Boys who ADMITTED running investigations for political purposes are running an 'investigation' with no powers to prosecute. That's a literal definition of a witch hunt.

    let me know when there is an actual CRIMINAL investigation where someone can be charged and prosecuted

    You know, like what Mueller is doing.

    Who is stopping anti establishment swamp cleaner Trump from appointing a special counsel? Guy is willing to take secret meetings to fire investigators but he won't tell Sessions to appoint an SP? Believable
     
    #28     Oct 31, 2017
    Tony Stark likes this.
  9. jem

    jem

    so on this thread you went from bullshitting about the uranium never leaving the country... to bullshitting about slam dunks. you called it a slam dunk.

    you are a worthless troll who will just keep trying to wear the other side out with bullshit and change of subject tactics.




     
    #29     Oct 31, 2017
  10. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    AGAIN, if I was bullshitting about Uranium being exported as you claim it was then it's a SLAM DUNK.

    Sending Uranium for processing or the government ordering it's export has got nothing to do with the claims you are making.

    And what subject did I change?

    You keep repeating how Hillary got 100 million from Russians while ignoring that it was a Canadian who didn't have any stake in the company.

    I am going to ignore your personal attacks for now, dont count on it next time.
     
    #30     Oct 31, 2017
    Tony Stark likes this.