OK, and I rightfully think that someone that says "I think the whole gay commentary comes from your statements about experimentation with your brother. I never saw the comments," .....is a douchebag and deserves insulting.
Who the fuck cares what you see? You are as blind and stupid as a rock. You don't even know that greenhouse gasses warm. That's pretty fucking stupid.
fraudcurrents.... do you have some sort of pyscho split with reality... CO2 always lags. co2 lags temperature in the historical data... and it always lagging in the current data... that means not concurrent. watch Salby or read this... http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...21818112001658 Abstract .... We find a high degree of co-variation between all data series except 7) and 8), but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature. The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11â12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5â10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes.
The recent CO2 rise over the last hundred years directly and concurrently resulted in a rise in global temperatures. That's proven science. Nothing other than CO2 explains the rise. Nothing. 97%
It's comments exactly like that which demonstrate how much you really don't have much intellect at all. CO2, man made or otherwise, has to cause warming you idiot. That's what co2 does. It's one reason why the Earth is warm enough to be habitable. It's how the environment works. It's scientific fact. Trying to argue co2 lags is a complete red-herring. You know , the thing you can manage, false argument. Gaps are utterly irrelevant to subsequent warming. Do you turn the power on in your home and say oh look, this gas has lagged the warming we had from it last time. Actually come to think of it, you're dim enough to. So once again. What is your problem with a lag in co2 even if there were one? Nah, second thoughts, go on, just act like the usual dickhead again and repeat your fake argument a hundred times. It's all you know how to do.
Can you explain the warming in the Medieval Warm Period? Can you explain the warming in the Roman times? Both periods were warmer than today before man put industrial CO2 into the air. Sadly you are wrong. All the evidence demonstrates that temperature leads CO2 by about 800 years in the long term history of the earth. In other words CO2 does not cause warming.