get back to me when you vote a straight libertarian ticket like I do. Then you can lecture me as to how even though I am voting libertarian, I am not really a libertarian. Please explain to me why you so called conservative republicans are against selling a carbon credit? It's my credit and I can sell it to whoever I want.
Surely you cant be this stupid can you? No self respecting libertarian would call for the carbon tax to begin with, so youd never have your carbon credit to use to sponge off of other people to begin with. I guess you are trying to tell us you are one of those redistributionist libertarians.
Actually "global warming" was changed to "climate change" because so many people had so much trouble wrapping their minds around the idea that warming eventually leads to cooling. You may be interested in what I posted the other day about the jet stream since the polar vortex we experienced is likely to occur again.
oh look the models predicted co2 would create warming (not in the ocean but in the global temperature indicies they were tracking) and they failed.
Here is proof jem is a deranged ideologue. Still have not seen a single thing from him or piehole that is from an authoritative and reliable source. Not one. Zero.
First here is just a fraction of the science i have presented. you have to wonder how someone like fraudcurrents could lie about something so simple. and then Mlynczak is the associate principal investigator for the SABER instrument onboard NASA’s TIMED satellite. SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances that play a key role in the energy balance of air hundreds of km above our planet’s surface. “Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.” That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe. “The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.” For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space. [/quote]
I think this explains how fraudcurrents, stu and db and other nutters could troll and lie so much. Trolls just want to have fun Erin E. Buckels ,Paul D. Trapnell, Delroy L. Paulhus Abstract In two online studies (total N = 1215), respondents completed personality inventories and a survey of their Internet commenting styles. Overall, strong positive associations emerged among online commenting frequency, trolling enjoyment, and troll identity, pointing to a common construct underlying the measures. Both studies revealed similar patterns of relations between trolling and the Dark Tetrad of personality: trolling correlated positively with sadism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism, using both enjoyment ratings and identity scores. Of all personality measures, sadism showed the most robust associations with trolling and, importantly, the relationship was specific to trolling behavior. Enjoyment of other online activities, such as chatting and debating, was unrelated to sadism. Thus cyber-trolling appears to be an Internet manifestation of everyday sadism.
I think this explains jem's innumerable posts on the same subject: Palilalia is defined as the repetition of the speaker's words or phrases, often for a varying number of repeats. Repeated units are generally whole sections of words and are larger than a syllable, with words being repeated the most often, followed by phrases, and then syllables or sounds.