Radiosondes measure temperature at the earths surface as well as at increasing altitudes. They simultaneously measure pressure and humidity. the fundamental problem is that the Hansen Hypothesis in inconsistent with some of the data records. Perhaps you are not aware that conventional surface temperature data is not obtained at constant altitude pressure and humidity.
So please tell us, since you pretend to know more than the actual climate scientists, what is wrong with the data from the world's top sources as presented below? And you keep bringing up "Hansen's Hypothesis" in an effort to ad hom and diminish it. It's actually called the greenhouse effect. And as I showed you multiple times now, Hansen was spot on, was not, and is not wrong . And radiosonds are not used for surface temps, so again you are wrong, for some deliberate reason.
Don't worry. There will be a new government report that is coming out in the future that will clear all of this up.
‘It’s Probably Over for Us’: Record Flooding Pummels Midwest When Farmers Can Least Afford It https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/...tion=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage This is starting to become more common and will get worse as the climate warms and the atmosphere contains more moisture.
One of the annoying things about both sides of this debate is the apparent ignorance of seasonal considerations such as snow melt. The other annoying thing is the hysteria associated with most common weather events such as “dryer than normal” or “colder than normal” every time a front passes through. Short term climate variations with their “extreme” conditions are statistically normal, should be expected, and are in fact, statistically inevitable over a longer time horizon even when there is no underlying climate trend. Another point is nothing meaningful relative to our current carbon emissions is going to be done until there are tangible, easily measurable benefits to adopting other energy sources. In other words, most of our debating is just hot air.
So perhaps you could provide a chart of what his predictions were and what they are now. All that you have said is some vague stuff about feedbacks that aren't there that he predicted and are occurring. What Hansen hypothesized is essentially what all of climate science has been saying and has in fact occurred. He was right. I suggest that if you want to be taken seriously that you show your work. Where are the charts? Here you may want to look at this. Ha, yeah sure. I posted this earlier and you ignored it. Maybe you missed it. LOL yeah sure. 30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction. https://www.theguardian.com/environ...out-hansens-amazing-global-warming-prediction
Maybe you missed the above post pie? lol I just want to make sure that you see it this time so you don't keep repeating the same tired BS about Hansen, as if you never saw this.
And we are near a solar minimum? The things are looking, I’ll gladly take AOC’s “12 years”! Rapid results in on climate change and the European heat wave Heat wave was several degrees Celsius hotter than an equivalent event in 1900. SCOTT K. JOHNSON - 7/2/2019, 2:45 PM Enlarge / How the warmest three-day averages from June rank—the darkest red area set new records. van Oldenborgh et al. 75WITH 41 POSTERS PARTICIPATING, INCLUDING STORY AUTHOR SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER Much of Europe—and particularly France—has been sweating through an incredible heat wave in recent days, with temperature records falling left and right. Despite it being only June (albeit the hottest June on record in Europe), a station in Gallargues-le-Montueux actually broke France's all-time high by more than 1.5°C, reaching a sweltering 45.9°C (114.6 °F). A team of climate scientists with an established method of rapidly analyzing extreme weather events like this has already taken a look at this heat wave. (The study has yet to be peer-reviewed but follows a protocol which has.) The team's results give a good idea of the role of climate change in this heat wave. FURTHER READING Climate change or “just the weather?” Here’s how to answer that The first question is how to define this weather event. The scientists decided to go with a human-health-relevant definition of the three-day mean temperature rather than a single daily high. They focused on June temperatures for the whole of France, as well as performing a local-scale analysis for just the city of Toulouse—where much of the team coincidentally happened to be attending a conference on weather extremes at the time. The analyses look at both changes in past weather data and a host of climate-model simulations. In this case, the data shows a very large increase in heat waves since the start of the 20th century. Based on the most recent data, this heat wave looks like it is approximately a 30-year event (meaning it has a probability of about 1 in 30 of occurring in a given year). Around 1900, however, this would have been a much rarer event. The difference means it's now roughly 100 times more likely to happen in our current, warmer climate. Put another way, the current 30-year heat wave event is a whopping 4°C or so hotter than what would have been a 30-year heat wave at the start of last century. These numbers came out pretty much the same for Toulouse and for France as a whole. The climate-model simulations proved a little murkier. To start with, the models' results were compared to data to see how accurately they simulate this particular weather pattern in this particular place. In this case, the model simulations produced fewer and weaker heat waves than have actually occurred, so the models have to be taken with a grain of salt. Nevertheless, they do all simulate increases in heat waves in France due to human-caused warming (that relationship is relatively straightforward). But the increase in probability was mainly in the 5- to 100-times-greater range. As for the increase in the temperature of a 30-year heat wave, it was closer to 1-2°C than the 4°C change seen in the actual data. Enlarge / How much warmer this heat wave was, in degrees C, compared to a 30-year heat wave in the early 1900s. Observed weather data shown in blue, and a collection of model simulation results is in red. van Oldenborgh et al Taken together, the researchers conclude that climate change made the recent heat wave at least five times more likely, though that's the lower limit of their results. This isn't really a surprise, especially given that past analyses by this team have found similar answers for other heat waves around Europe. Fortunately, the researchers also note that past heat waves have led to improvements in preparedness. The extreme heat was forecast days in advance, and France put its emergency plans into motion—very likely saving lives.