I was wrong, there are indeed climate scientists that deny manmade global warming

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, Jan 1, 2017.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #11     Jan 1, 2017
  2. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #12     Jan 1, 2017
    WeToddDid2, stoic and Tom B like this.
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #13     Jan 1, 2017
    WeToddDid2, MoneyMatthew and Tom B like this.
  4. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #14     Jan 1, 2017
    MoneyMatthew likes this.
  5. Of the world's countries, the climate change denial industry is most powerful in the United States. Since January 2015, the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works has been chaired by oil lobbyist and climate denier Jim Inhofe. Inhofe is notorious for having called climate change "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated against the American people" and for having claimed to have debunked the alleged hoax in February 2015 when he brought a snowball with him in the Senate chamber and tossed it across the floor.[19] Organised campaigning to undermine public trust in climate science is associated with conservative economic policies and backed by industrial interests opposed to the regulation of CO2 emissions.[20] Climate change denial has been associated with the fossil fuels lobby, the Koch brothers, industry advocates and libertarian think tanks, often in the United States.[15][21][22][23]More than 90% of papers sceptical on climate change originate from right-wing think tanks.[24] The total annual income of these climate change counter-movement-organizations is roughly $900 million.[25] Between 2002 and 2010, nearly $120 million (£77 million) was anonymously donated via the Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund to more than 100 organisations seeking to undermine the public perception of the science on climate change.[26] In 2013 the Center for Media and Democracy reported that the State Policy Network (SPN), an umbrella group of 64 U.S. think tanks, had been lobbying on behalf of major corporations and conservative donors to oppose climate change regulation.[27]

    Since the late 1970s, oil companies have published research broadly in line with the standard views on global warming. Despite this, oil companies organized a climate change denial campaign to disseminate public disinformation for several decades, a strategy that has been compared to the organized denial of the hazards of tobacco smoking by tobacco companies.[28][29]
     
    #15     Jan 1, 2017
  6. jem

    jem

    since the first thermometer the temperature records shows changes in warming and cooling ocean temps precede co2 levels. co2 levels do not lead temps.
     
    #16     Jan 1, 2017

  7. You are a moron, not a skeptic.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2017
    #17     Jan 2, 2017
  8. Banjo

    Banjo


  9. I've always wondered what kind of idiot reads zerohedge. Now I know.


    Zero Hedge is a batshit insane Austrian school finance blog run by two pseudonymous founders who post articles under the name "Tyler Durden," after the character from Fight Club.[​IMG] It has accurately predicted 200 of the last 2 recessions.[citation NOT needed]

    Tyler claims to be a "believer in a sweeping conspiracy that casts the alumni of Goldman Sachs as a powerful cabal at the helm of U.S. policy, with the Treasury and the Federal Reserve colluding to preserve the status quo." While this is not an entirely unreasonable statement of the problem,[1] his solution actually mirrors the antagonist in Fight Club: Tyler wants, per Austrian school ideas, to lead a catastrophic market crash in order to destroy banking institutions and bring back "real" free market capitalism.[2]

    The site posts nearly indecipherable analyses of multiple seemingly unrelated subjects to point towards a consistent theme of economic collapse any day now. Tyler seems to repeat The Economic Collapse Blog's idea of posting blog articles many times a day and encouraging people to post it as far and wide as humanly possible. Tyler moves away from the format of long lists to write insanely dense volumes[3] filled with (often contradicting) jargon that makes one wonder if the writers even know what the words actually mean.[4] The site first appeared in early 2009, meaning that (given Tyler's habit of taking a shit on each and every positive data point), anyone listening to him from the beginning missed the entire 2009-2014 rally in the equities market.

    The only writer conclusively identified is Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.[5] The blog came online several days after he lost his job at Wexford Capital, a Connecticut-based hedge fund (run by a former Goldman trader). Later Colin Lokey joined Zero Hedge's writing team in 2015 and left in April 2016 publishing an article identifying the writing team as Dan Ivandjiiski, Tim Backshall, and himself. This is quite a bit less than the 40 or so writers Ivandjiiski claimed to be on staff in earlier years. Note that they chose the pen name from a nihilistic psychotic delusion.

    Zero Hedge is not quite the NaturalNews of economics, but not for want of trying.
     
    #19     Jan 2, 2017
    exGOPer likes this.
  10. jem

    jem

    the irony of your illogical critique of the messenger instead of the message is that your most frequent nutter link is to a cartoonist who creates the content at skeptical science.

     
    #20     Jan 2, 2017
    traderob likes this.