Interactive Brokers suffers $22m market making loss

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by Zzzz1, Apr 19, 2017.

  1. just21

    just21

    Customer equity has reached $96 billion at IB and is accelerating.
     
    #11     Apr 19, 2017
  2. RedDuke

    RedDuke

    As big as IB is, it is a retail shop.
     
    #12     Apr 19, 2017
  3. JackRab

    JackRab

    Most people here in this thread have absolutely no idea how MM's work.

    MM's are not brokers... they usually don't even have a brokerage dept. They don't make money on fees... they pay fees, just like we do (only less). They make money on the b/a spread together with very fast systems. But indeed, like @ajacobson points out... (and I pointed out in another thread) Timber Hill was never any good at market making in the true sense of the word. They possibly had quick systems, at least when they started... but they were not exactly known for their superior skills in actively trading/market making options...

    Most money is in trading/market making in large blocks off exchange... I hardly came across them in European markets. Which meant they didn't do that much of that... missing out on valuable info regarding flow etc. And you basically train your market makers to be computer nerds that only activate the systems and now and then adjust their params in an assertive way. Picking up the leftovers that other market makers leave behind, which pick up the bigger pieces that larger traders leave behind. They are/were basically the lowest bottom feeders.

    Their brokerage, or I should say their parent company IB is mainly focussed on the retail/semi-pro brokerage. Which will keep doing what they do, regardless of the closure of TH.
     
    #13     Apr 19, 2017
    Windlesham1 likes this.
  4. ironchef

    ironchef

    How could that be possible? I always thought they feed off small mom and pop retail traders through bid/ask spread, always hedged and so would profit no matter how the market behaved?
     
    #14     Apr 20, 2017
  5. JackRab

    JackRab

    Overhead for one...

    But MM's are not always hedged... not fully that is
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2017
    #15     Apr 20, 2017
    murray t turtle likes this.
  6. Zzzz1

    Zzzz1

    Agree and the article should not be seen as it being otherwise.

     
    #16     Apr 20, 2017
  7. JSOP

    JSOP

    Basically just like that guy in "Margin Call": Their loss is your gain.

    With them gone, I DO see a drop in liquidity and a narrowing of strike price levels though.
     
    #17     Apr 20, 2017
  8. Zzzz1

    Zzzz1

    At least we will see more money plowed into their core broker operations. Maybe some clients will benefit.

     
    #18     Apr 20, 2017
  9. JSOP

    JSOP

    Which is what? Routing our trades? Honestly even their so called "SMART" routing algorithm is REALLY broken. I thought it's supposed to constantly work for you to route your orders according to your preference. So far, all I see is as soon as you transmitted the order, it just goes to this one exchange and that's it. If the exchange rejects it, the order just gets held somewhere. I don't see that as any different from routing an order directly to an exchange.

    Did they post positive earnings at least?
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2017
    #19     Apr 20, 2017
  10. JackRab

    JackRab

    There is so much BS in this post... where do I begin?

    The other day I had an options trade go to 8 different exchanges. And your last question shows you don't really follow anything concerning IB...
     
    #20     Apr 20, 2017