Also, and it is sort a big one, he rejoined the WHO without extracting any agreements for restructuring or correcting of past wrongdoings, nor any negotiation of the U.S. contribution or rather raising the contribution of others. Thus we rejoin the organization that was run by the Chinese on our dime and was complicit in hiding the number one public health event for a hundred years. The binary thinkers here and elsewhere like to present the issue as to whether you support world health or not. No, if you support world health you support changes at WHO and the elimination of China's ownership of it. C'MON MAN!
Well... there are large convoys of US troops and support personnel on the move in Syria. I'm not sure I would characterize it as an invasion. I think the Harris regime will describe it as anti-ISIS operations or something like that. Liberals and neo-cons love war.
We have been in Syria for many years already... also the report comes from Syria government media saying that so let's take it with a grain a salt. Also you cannot invade a country you already have troops in so it is just an attention grabbing headline wiht no facts. Also news source says common for equipment to move back and forth between Iraq and kurd controlled areas of Syria.. Calling it an invasion is typical media fabrication on both sides.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...al-costs-insulin-epipens-please-corporatists/ Beijing Biden Ends President Trump’s Policy of Reducing Medical Costs on Insulin and EpiPens to Please Corporatists
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/l...cases-dismissed-only-on-legal-process-grounds Law prof: Election fraud evidence significant, cases dismissed only on legal process grounds ‘I’ve reviewed hours upon hours of public hearings. I have read almost all of the lawsuits that are out there … There is evidence,’ the professor emphasized. These suits, he said, were dismissed due to a legal lack of standing. “The general argument” that was presented in these cases, he said, “was that because this was a general harm,” then “you have no standing because your harm has to be particular. It’s not because there isn’t evidence. There is evidence,” the professor emphasized. “In fact, I’m in possession of 574 pages of sworn affidavits, forensic reports, all of which would make its way in a court of law under the rules of evidence in a federal or state court. The fact that the evidence has not been heard here by these courts” should not be conflated into “this idea that there is no evidence,” Clements argued. “The courts have done what they always do,” Clements explained. “When you have political matters, they want them to be decided politically, not in a court room, but through the elections, through the state legislatures.”