cognitive dissonance..,, arguing that science has proof that man made co2 causes warming and at the same time not being able to provide any. (other than failed computer simulations.)
Oh I'm sure if you look you can find it. You DO know what google is right? But what you see may cause you cognitive dissonance so you will probably not look.
Probably the best single source for the science of global warming is Skeptical Science. Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook. "Cook is trained as a solar physicist and says he is motivated by his Christian beliefs.[19] He is one of a number of Christians publicly arguing for scientific findings on anthropogenic global warming, and is an evangelical Christian.[20]"
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/w...teven-goddard/ Who Is Steven Goddard? My name is Tony Heller. I am a whistle blower. I am an independent thinker who is considered a heretic by the orthodoxy on both sides of the climate debate. I live in Columbia, Maryland â an amazing city where I can ride my bicycle everywhere through the forest, and never need to get in a car. I am a lifelong environmentalist. I testified at my first Congressional subcommittee hearing at age 15 in Kanab, Utah, in support of a wilderness area â very close to the one which President Obama recently set aside. I worked to get the Clean Air Act passed. I worked as a volunteer wilderness ranger for two summers in the Cibola and Santa Fe National Forests in New Mexico. I worked on the Safety Analysis Report for DOEâs nuclear waste disposal site in New Mexico. I probably have the smallest electricity bill in Columbia, Maryland because I am very careful not to waste. I have never turned on my heat or air conditioning. I have degrees in Geology and Electrical Engineering, and worked on the design team of many of the worldâs most complex designs, including some which likely power your PC or Mac. I have worked as a contract software developer on climate and weather models for the US government. I do not receive any funding other than small donations on my blog, which have worked out well below minimum wage. I have tried to obtain funding, but skeptics with money are terrified of political attacks directed by the White House and/or being targeted by the IRS. They openly state this to me. My position on global warming: The claims of 97% consensus are a massive lie. Only 52% of American Meteorological Society members believe that man is the primary contributor to global warming. The radiative transfer models used by government climate scientists show that going up to 550 PPM or even 1000 PPM CO2 will make minimal difference to the radiative balance of the atmosphere. The knee of the CO2 curve is at about 30 PPM, and additional CO2 has little first order effect. This is because almost all radiation in the CO2 absorption spectra is already being absorbed by H2O or CO2 molecules. Adding more CO2 has minimal effect, because there is not much radiation left to be absorbed. (This is a bit of an oversimplification because of second order effects, but those are also small.) There is no indication from the radiative transfer models used by government scientists that additional CO2 will cause large amounts of heating. The temperature record of both the US and the world has been massively altered since older versions, almost invariably to create the appearance of more warming, and in some cases to create warming where there is none. Sea level has been rising for 20,000 years, and is now 400 feet higher than it was when the first humans walked to North America from Asia across the Bering Strait. Most of the apparent sea level rise on the US East Coast is due to the land sinking, not sea level rising. There has been little or no sea level rise on the West Coast. The weather is not getting more severe. Since President Obama took office, there have been three US hurricane strikes â the fewest of any presidency. While Grover Cleveland was president in the 1880â²s, the US was hit by twenty-six hurricanes. The US is currently experiencing its longest period since the 1860â²s without a major (category 3-5) hurricane strike. The last one was Wilma in 2005. Florida is currently experiencing the longest period on record without a hurricane strike. The US tornado count over the past two years has been the lowest in the modern record. Americaâs worst forest fires occurred in 1871, when thousands of people burned to death in horrific firestorms around the Great Lakes â on the same day that Chicago burned to the ground. Is climate change real? Climate is cyclical and is always changing. People always imagine that they live in the worst of times, as this 1871 article from the Brisbane Courier states. BkV2czHCQAEkDE0 (1) 10 Jan 1871 â IMAGINARY CHANGES OF CLIMATE. (Pall Mall Gazette.) If you want to learn more about climate history, I have assembled a large collection of old newspaper articles about the weather below 350 PPM CO2. If you read through this, you will understand that lowering CO2 will not make the weather any better, or worse. I am more than happy to debate anyone who feels up to the challenge, including the President of The United States. Science works through research and debate â not censorship, propaganda, faith, or intimidation. Share this:
actually... http://www.skepticalscience.com/about.shtml About the author Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook, the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland. He studied physics at the University of Queensland, Australia. After graduating, he majored in solar physics in his post-grad honours year. He is not a climate scientist. Consequently, the science presented on Skeptical Science is not his own but taken directly from the peer reviewed scientific literature. To those seeking to refute the science presented, one needs to address the peer reviewed papers where the science comes from (links to the full papers are provided whenever possible). There is no funding to maintain Skeptical Science other than Paypal donations - it's run at personal expense. John Cook has no affiliations with any organisations or political groups. Skeptical Science is strictly a labour of love. The design was created by John's talented web designer wife.
Skeptical Science is a climate alarmist website created by a self-employed cartoonist, John Cook (who apparently pretends to be a Nazi). It is moderated by zealots who ruthlessly censor any and all form of dissent from their alarmist position. This way they can pretend to win arguments, when in reality they have all been refuted. The abuse and censorship does not pertain to simply any dissenting commentator there but to highly credentialed and respected climate scientists as well; Dr. Pielke Sr. has unsuccessfully attempted to engage in discussions there only to be childishly taunted and censored, while Dr. Michaels has been dishonestly quoted and smeared. The irony of the site's oxymoronic name "Skeptical Science" is that the site is not skeptical of even the most extreme alarmist positions. John Cook is now desperately trying to cover up his background that he was employed as a cartoonist for over a decade with no prior employment history in academia or climate science. Thanks to the Wayback Machine we can reveal what his website originally said, "I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist" - John Cook, Skeptical Science http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html
Actually, thanks to the wayback machine: "This site was created by John Cook. I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist and web programmer by trade." http://web.archive.org/web/20080213042858/http://www.skepticalscience.com/page.php?p=3
I may refer to fraudcurrents as clownedcurrents. by the way clowned currents... I normally argue its the data not the messenger but... you kept trying to make a big deal about steven goodard vs john cook. now we know... your clown team containing a train engineer as the head of the IPPC... hansen who was ejected by NASA and now a cartoonist hired by al gore vs a real scientists.