Sorry, but I think that's a bit hyperbole. They introduce the stories, and then during the comments and editorials, they also provide some facts in the discussion you were not aware of. In the example of the mall shooting, you might learn that the suspect's firearm was illegally obtained. Or that he/she was an immigrant. I will agree that the signal to noise ratio is horrendous, and that it takes a skilled "watcher", if there is such a thing, to discern opinion from fact. But it is there.
Yeah, I agree. The major media networks provided so much pro-Hillary coverage -- they basically became her cheerleaders rather than honest media outlets.
Of course you know that I was referring to the outcome of the election rather than its coverage. But your comment, perhaps best described as verbal slapstick, was delightfully jocular. Don't ever lose that sense of humor.
I see that, Gayfly. I also see that no one here seems to agree with you on much. How's your salad tossing going?
To thine own self be true. And, evidently, you are. Why be burdened by character or class when it is not in your nature?
I was fine with semi-cordial discussion. But now I'm just trying to be what you say I already am, so toss on, Gayfly.
I don't remember Ditch making those comments, so they must be coming from you naturally. We all revert to our true nature.
No, that time I was Tom. I'll be Ditch in the next post, Brasshole. The advantage to being lumped in with "all my bros" is that there's just so many to pick from and channel. Stay tuned when I channel my inner Max Pad and start talking about how it's no wonder you're almost 60, living alone and gay with your attitude.