I wish Global Warming would kick in where I live. I've burned up $902 of LP gas in the last 11 weeks. Time to get the tank filled again for another thousand bucks. I wish I was rich like Algore so I could crank the heat up. Right now I'm wearing 2 pairs sweatpants, heavy insulated pants, sweatshirt, heavy coat and cap. Painesdale, MI has received 5.4 FEET (64.5 inches) of snow in the last 6 days with more on the way.
100% people who breath AIR will die because of internal oxidation which causes worn out cells. Oxygen is found to the the cause of oxidation. Oxygen has a 100% death rate. Carbon by itself is a stable inert element. If not for oxygen, there will be not carbon dioxide. We should out law all consumption of oxygen. If we want to get rid of CO2, we must get rid of the active ingredient: oxygen.
none of us can truly prove or disprove global warming. we all know that the weather is getting crazier and warmer over the years. but what makes absolutely no sense to me is that some people want MORE air pollution. if global warming is a total lie, it doesnt mean we should be able to pollute the air all we want. what happened to having clean air to breathe? i dont know why neocons think "clean air" is only important to liberals.
So if liberals are against laws to stop voting fraud, I guess you would say that they want MORE voting fraud, eh?
Everything alive has a carbon footprint, regardless of how miniscule it is. Breathing and converting oxygen to CD is a carbon footprint. The earth can deal with linear systems of forcing all on it's own and maintain a balance. It is nonlinear feedback effects that it cannot deal with while maintaining a balance between it's occupants. nitro
Had radical left environmentalists not prevented the building of nuke plants, the air would be much cleaner today. Even the French have it figured out. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/06/60minutes/main2655782.shtml
I want less pollution and cleaner air to breathe. Yet for some strange reason the war on global warming has no interest in reducing pollution, only reducing CO2. Yet Algore is against nuclear energy. He's only interested in reducing CO2 and reducing the economic output of free countries and supports a carbon tax.
what part of "Inconvenient TRUTH", do you not understand? we have a few years, as DiCaprio stated, "We are on the brink of disaster"... (in keeping with quoting celebrities) So, you better "have a large supply of body bags", or how about "we are going to need a bigger boat". I LOOOOOOOOOOVE POLLUTION....... I BATHE IN POLLUTION! It's Yummy!
i have never heard liberals or anyone say they want MORE voting fraud. i have heard neocons on TV saying they think it is okay to pollute all they want. i debate with guys in my gym that vote republican and think only liberal pussies should care about a clean environment and that the earth can handle all the pollution we produce. i am not saying everyone against global warming is pro-pollution but there certainly are a number of regular folks out there who want to be free to pollute as much as they want and any restrictions on pollution is a liberal cause.