Not 0.3% but 97% of the world's climatologists agree

it could be ocean temps or local. Surely you are not arguing that temperatures are going up the last 158 months?

 

you are not trying to argue land temperatures have gone up in a statistically significantly way the last 17 years are you? You would be just about the only nutter left doing that.

 

First tell me that you don't believe in AGW and I'll answer you. Is it that hard?

 

well jem? You still can't just come out and say it can you. I must admit, at least you must have some integrity. You just can't come out and say that you don't believe in AGW because that would be a lie.

 

Here is just a small part of the science showing anthropogenic CO2 is causing the earth's temperature to rise.

 

So if it's "ocean temps", then ocean temps have gone up. Or if it's "local", then local temps have gone up. That's one beauty of melting ice: it doesn't have a political agenda, so it doesn't lie.

 

So let's see. If we draw a straight line from this cherry picked point to that cherry picked point.

And jerm has the balls to be such an in-your-face- deciever. As if it really means something.

It makes sense though. Real estate people are scummy and lawyers are scummy and he combines both into a very high level of scumbaggery.

 

Yes and at least one study stated that ocean temps have been going up for over 100 years.
and warming oceans release co2.

So that is one reason we know co2 is rising.

 

you need to give us the source of that chart....

that data seems to be bullshit. I need to know who created using what data.
its not the regular year by year land temp data til 2013.

If it turns out that chart is not made of the yearly data... it shows what troll scum you are.
You can't do science with real data.. so you make up charts with mis representative labeling.
In short you accuse me of being the fraud scum you in fact are.

 

if you are truthful fraudcurrents... (very rare) you will admit that you actually used and old chart of monthly data... and then tricked us by putting on dots and yearly marks.

But, even that was old data.... updated it now looks like this.

What a fraud you are.
You have resorted to falsifying data.
You are a crazy agw nutter troll and should be ashamed of yourself.


[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]