fraudcurrents you lying fraud... the models predicted the land temps would go up not the ocean temps. the oceans release co2 when they warm. But again... you are changing the subject.... you misrepresented the charts you were posting. How can you accept yourself being so slimey. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Uif1NwcUgMU?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The start of the growth in CO2 concentration coincides with the start of the industrial revolution, hence anthropogenic; Increase in CO2 concentration over the long term almost exactly correlates with cumulative anthropogenic emissions, hence anthropogenic; Annual CO2 concentration growth is less than Annual CO2 emissions, hence anthropogenic; Declining C14 ratio indicates the source is very old, hence fossil fuel or volcanic (ie, not oceanic outgassing or a recent biological source); Declining C13 ratio indicates a biological source, hence not volcanic; Declining O2 concentration indicate combustion, hence not volcanic; Partial pressure of CO2 in the ocean is increasing, hence not oceanic outgassing; Measured CO2 emissions from all (surface and beneath the sea) volcanoes are one-hundredth of anthropogenic CO2 emissions; hence not volcanic; Known changes in biomass too small by a factor of 10, hence not deforestation; and Known changes of CO2 concentration with temperature are too small by a factor of 10, hence not ocean outgassing.
Oh, and the level of CO2 is the earth's thermostat setting. CO2 is a greenhouse gas Jem believes in man-made global warming.
Yes, jem is definitely a nutter. But he's not stupid. He's playing defense attorney for a known murderer. It's pretty perverse if you ask me.
Here is proof that man is responsible for the rise in CO2. Anyone trying to argue otherwise is either very stupid or a denialist nutter. Same thing. Actually, current levels are over 400 ppm.
Yes, jem is definitely a nutter. But he's not stupid. He's playing defense attorney for a known murderer. It's pretty perverse if you ask me. LOL....I take it back, maybe you ARE stupid. Good thing you are not doing important law. Ummm jem, it's called a metaphor. You are defending the denialist position though you know the science is correct and that AGW is a fact. And that's pretty sick.
So you're saying if I get busted smuggling a ton of coke into the country. I should call someone else?
A small number of aristocrats have collectively spent, on average, a billion dollars a year, in order to fool the American public into thinking that climate change isn't happening, and that, even if it is, it's not caused by burning fossil fuels. These aristocrats control fossil fuels corporations, such as Koch Industries, and ExxonMobil, but their money for this mass-deception campaign is laundered through far-right-wing foundations they control, to think-tanks they control, which buy professors to provide "authority" for these distortions and outright lies. That is why the reality (a graphical presentation of which can be seen at places such as this), though acknowledged by virtually all climatologists, is rejected, just disbelieved, by much of the public. .....They, in turn, pay professors and journalists to write, both for the "news media," and for professional journals, to debunk or (in the scholarly publications) to raise questions about, global warming or its cause -- questions that are no longer even questions among actual climate scientists. This study, titled "Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations," reports that all of this money is spent "on maintaining a field frame that justifies unlimited use of fossil fuels by attempting to delegitimate the science that supports the necessity of mandatory limits on carbon emissions. To accomplish this goal in the face of massive scientific evidence of anthropogenic climate change [which is documented in that link] has meant the development of an active campaign to manipulate and mislead the public over the nature of climate science and the threat posed by climate change. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/billiondollarayear-progra_b_4513944.html