I don't see a single mainstream outlet reporting the bolded.....tons of right wing blogs and tabloids though. C'mon Vanz, look who's making the accusation.
Are you claiming that you don't believe these are the identity of these two women in the elevator? Seriously? After they wrote editorials in the NY Times, Washington Post, etc. After their organizations proudly supported what they did. Here is some educational reading material - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Maria_Archila#Center_for_Popular_Democracy https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...90f1daae309_story.html?utm_term=.e4e1bad2ffb2 http://time.com/5412444/jeff-flake-elevator-protester/ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/04/opinion/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-vote.html Staff at the Center for Popular Democracy- Ana Maria Archila, Co-Executive Director https://populardemocracy.org/about-us/staff https://populardemocracy.org/blog/a...s-senator-jeff-flake-ahead-supreme-court-vote
I'm not denying their identity; don't be daft. I'm questioning the implication that they're Soros agents via their employer (aka paid actresses as suggested). The story has no legs. Here's the kicker though, even if they had a history of being democrats and active politically, they still could've been abused. Hell, one can even argue their activism to their history of abuse. After all, don't recovering addicts and sexual victims usually run similar support groups? What's worse, even if a Soros link exist to the group (which is the meat of the matter), this is America and anyone can do as they god damn please with their money. How many foundations are going to be deemed "unclean" because billionaire philanthropists with an opinion have donated to them?
What's wrong with this picture class? https://bangordailynews.com/2018/10...rsity-pulls-pop-up-credit-to-protest-collins/
Kagan and Sotomeyor are not smiling here. Good. If they are not smiling, I am. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...preme-court-may-not-have-a-swing-vote-anymore
I am in disbelief that you are even trying to make a claim that both of these organizations (Center for Popular Democracy and Ultraviolet) are not funded by Soros after all the mainstream media has articles stating explicitly they are funded & backed by Soros and the press releases of the two organizations also state so. Let's take a look an article by the BBC (Yes, even overseas they know that Soros funds these organizations). Kavanaugh confirmation: What Trump's 'elevator screamers' tweet tells us BBC article link - https://tinyurl.com/y7yj2g77 "Soros drew Mr Trump's attention in this case perhaps because he supports the Center for Popular Democracy and Ultraviolet, which not only helped put together the protest but also (in a press release that has since been deleted from their website) claimed Archila and Gallagher as members."
Either one of them could decide to be a swing vote if they truly are concerned about it. Don't count on it.
Yeh. One of the foreigner clowns here had the audacity yesterday to suggest that Ginsburg has never expressed a political thought or action while on the court. In fact, there are not enough hours in the day to quote every poltical statement that leftwing hack nutjob has made. Don't count on her being the swing vote any time soon. The only time she will not be be advancing her left wing causes is when she is dead, and even then it is is debateable. https://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/12/...-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-faker/index.html